首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Cheating nature?
【24h】

Cheating nature?

机译:欺骗自然?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

However much its practitioners might wish otherwise, science is inevitably political. A lot of it is funded by taxpayers. Most of it has enormous-if often underappreciated-effects on humanity. That, after all, is why taxpayers are called upon to fund it in the first place. Which science gets done, and how its results are applied, are thus legitimate concerns of governments and their policymakers. But one thing that scientists like to think really does distinguish their discipline from many other human endeavours is its honesty. Partly because they are taught to think that way, and partly because nature cannot be cheated, and thus scientists who cheat will be found out, science sees itself as a moral cut above most professions. This may be self-serving or a delusion, but it nevertheless means that scientists react badly to threats to their intellectual integrity. So when such a threat is perceived to come from the world's biggest funder of scientific research-the American government-things can turn nasty.
机译:无论其从业者多么希望否则,科学不可避免地是政治性的。其中很多是由纳税人资助的。其中大多数对人类都有巨大的影响,甚至常常被低估。毕竟,这就是为什么要求纳税人首先为其提供资金的原因。因此,完成哪门科学及其结果如何应用,是政府及其政策制定者的合理关切。但是,科学家喜欢认为的一件事确实使他们的学科与许多其他人类活动区分开来,这是它的诚实。部分原因是因为他们被教导要以这种方式思考,部分原因是自然无法被欺骗,因此会发现作弊的科学家,科学将自身视为超越大多数专业的道德准则。这可能是自私自利或妄想,但这仍然意味着科学家对威胁其智力完整性的反应很差。因此,当人们认为这种威胁来自世界上最大的科学研究资助者时,美国政府的情况可能会变得令人讨厌。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2004年第8370期|p.75-76|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 经济;各科经济学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:32:43

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号