【24h】

Letters

机译:字母

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Your latest fulminations against Narendra Modi ("Agent Orange", May 4th) follow a line of attack at The Economist based on innuendo and indefensible criticisms. Thus, you fault India's prime minister for his handling of the dastardly Pulwama attack, masterminded by Pakistani terrorists, but neglect to tell the reader that his actions received unqualified approval from all Western democracies. You claim demonetisation caused "huge disruption" to farmers and small businesses, but cite no data or surveys substantiating it. In fact, a study co-authored by Gita Gopinath, the director of research at the IMF and a critic of demonetisation, finds that the effects dissipated within a few months and the growth rate during the year of demonetisation fell by no more than 0.5% on account of the measure.
机译:您最近一次对纳伦德拉·莫迪(Narendra Modi)的称赞(5月4日,“特工橘子”)是根据《经济学人》的一言一行和无可辩驳的批评而发动的攻击。因此,您谴责印度总理处理巴基斯坦恐怖分子策划的卑鄙的普尔瓦玛袭击事件,但却忽视了告诉读者他的行动得到了所有西方民主国家的无条件认可。您声称取消货币化对农民和小型企业造成了“巨大破坏”,但没有任何数据或调查可以证明这一点。实际上,由国际货币基金组织研究部主任,反对货币化的批评家吉塔·戈皮纳特(Gita Gopinath)合着的一项研究发现,这种影响在几个月之内就消失了,并且货币化年内的增长率下降了不超过0.5%。根据措施。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2019年第9143期|12-13|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 04:12:22

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号