首页> 外文期刊>Economics of governance >The Wild Bunch! An empirical note on populism and economic institutions
【24h】

The Wild Bunch! An empirical note on populism and economic institutions

机译:野束!关于民粹主义和经济制度的经验说明

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The debate on populism has recently been revitalized by the rise of new political actors, especially in Latin America and Europe. Despite the renewed interest, the concept of populism remains vague, complicating any empirical investigation on its political and economic outcomes. Still, all populist politicians strongly emphasize the defense of the common man's interest against those of privileged elites, suggesting that such governments will have notable implications for economic policy and institutions. Using a non-partisan indicator of populism, this paper seeks to assess the impact of populist policies on institutional change, as measured by the economic freedom of the world index. Results indicate that populist governments actively reduce economic freedom. In particular, they erode legal security, reduce freedom to trade, and tighten economic regulation. Findings expand on previous research with empirical methodology, questioning the importance of ideological orientation in some definitions of populism.
机译:最近,随着新的政治角色的出现,尤其是在拉丁美洲和欧洲,兴起了关于民粹主义的辩论。尽管重新引起了人们的兴趣,但民粹主义的概念仍然含糊不清,使对其政治和经济成果进行的任何实证研究都变得复杂。尽管如此,所有民粹主义政治家都强烈强调捍卫普通人的利益与特权精英的利益,这表明这种政府将对经济政策和体制产生显着影响。本文使用无党派的民粹主义指标,试图评估民粹主义政策对制度变革的影响,以世界经济自由指数衡量。结果表明,民粹主义政府积极减少了经济自由。特别是,它们削弱了法律安全,减少了贸易自由,并加强了经济监管。研究结果以经验方法论扩展了先前的研究,质疑意识形态取向在某些民粹主义定义中的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号