首页> 外文期刊>Economic modelling >The devil in the style: Mutual fund style drift, performance and common risk factors
【24h】

The devil in the style: Mutual fund style drift, performance and common risk factors

机译:风格中的魔鬼:共同基金风格漂移,业绩和共同风险因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Style drift contributes to mutual fund performance at the cost of additional risks associated with styles. We find that, although style drift enhances the net return of Chinese mutual funds by 3.03% per month relative to peer funds, the profit is at risk. That is, applying the Carhart four-factor model with style drift leaves fund investors no significant premium (i.e. a = 0.02% per month, t = 0.20). Both active and passive style drifts can leverage up fund performance, but risk-adjusted returns show that low passive style drift funds benefit more from subsequent active style drifts than high passive style drift funds. Cross-sectional results are consistent with portfolio results, and further show that the predictive power of style drift is neither driven by insider information nor by idiosyncratic volatility.
机译:风格漂移以共同风格带来的额外风险为代价,有助于共同基金的表现。我们发现,尽管风格漂移使中国共同基金的每月净回报率相对于同业基金提高了3.03%,但获利却面临风险。也就是说,采用具有风格漂移的Carhart四因子模型,不会给投资者带来可观的溢价(即a =每月0.02%,t = 0.20)。主动式和被动式漂移都可以利用基金的业绩,但是风险调整后的收益表明,被动式低漂移基金比后续被动式漂移基金受益更大。横截面结果与投资组合结果一致,进一步表明,风格漂移的预测能力既不是由内部信息驱动的,也不是由特质波动性驱动的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号