首页> 外文期刊>Ecological research >Effects of internal conductance and Rubisco on the optimum temperature for leaf photosynthesis in Fallopia japonica growing at different altitudes
【24h】

Effects of internal conductance and Rubisco on the optimum temperature for leaf photosynthesis in Fallopia japonica growing at different altitudes

机译:内部电导和Rubisco对不同海拔下日本粳稻叶片光合作用最适温度的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To investigate mechanisms of adjustment of the optimum temperature for leaf photosynthesis in alpine plants, we compared the temperature responses of photosynthesis, internal conductance (g_i), and the amounts of activated Rubisco (ε) in two Fallopia japonica populations growing at elevations of 100 m (K0100), and 2250 m (F2250). There was an obvious difference in photosynthesis at high temperatures between the two populations, although there was no significant difference in the CO_2/O_2 specificity of Rubisco. Optimum temperatures for photosynthesis were 25 and 30 ℃ in F2250 and K0100, respectively. The temperature response of ε was similar to that of photosynthesis. The mean values of e decreased 25 % (F2250) and 24 % (K0100), for temperatures 5 ℃ above the optimum for photosynthesis. In contrast, g_i exponentially increased with increasing temperature in both populations. There was no significant difference in g_i between populations for any given temperature. In both populations, there were no changes in CO_2 concentrations at the Rubisco active site, when temperatures were above the photosynthetic optimum temperature. This clearly shows that photosynthetic optimum temperatures were not affected by photosynthetic limitation of CO_2 diffusing from intercellular air spaces to Rubisco. Furthermore, the atmospheric pressure had a minor effect on the temperature response of photosynthesis. Thus, the decrease in e in response to elevated temperatures reduced the photosynthetic optimum temperature in highland population of F. japonica, which was adjusted to the habitat.
机译:为了研究调节高山植物叶片光合作用的最佳温度的调节机制,我们比较了两个海拔100 m的日本粳稻种群中光合作用的温度响应,内部电导(g_i)和活化的Rubisco(ε)的量。 (K0100)和2250 m(F2250)。尽管Rubisco的CO_2 / O_2特异性没有显着差异,但两个种群在高温下的光合作用存在明显差异。在F2250和K0100中,光合作用的最适温度分别为25和30℃。 ε的温度响应与光合作用相似。在比光合作用最佳温度高5℃的温度下,e的平均值下降了25%(F2250)和24%(K0100)。相反,在两个种群中,g_i都随着温度的升高呈指数增长。对于任何给定温度,群体之间的g_i均无显着差异。在两个种群中,当温度高于光合作用的最佳温度时,Rubisco活性位点的CO_2浓度均没有变化。这清楚地表明,光合作用的最佳温度不受CO_2从细胞间空气空间扩散到Rubisco的光合作用限制的影响。此外,大气压对光合作用的温度响应影响很小。因此,e的降低是由于高温引起的,降低了粳稻高地种群的光合最适温度,该温度已根据栖息地进行了调整。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ecological research》 |2015年第1期|163-171|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Biological Laboratory, Center for Natural Sciences, Kitasato University, Kitasato, 1-15-1, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-0373, Japan;

    Mount Fuji Research Institute, Yamanashi Prefectural Government, Kamiyoshida, 5597-1, Fujiyoshida, Yamanashi 403-0005, Japan;

    Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate Schools of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Minami-Osawa 1-1, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Alpine plants; Internal conductance; Low atmospheric pressure; Photosynthesis; Rubisco;

    机译:高山植物;内部电导;低气压;光合作用;鲁比斯科;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号