首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Spatial and temporal variability of diatom and macroinvertebrate communities: How representative are ecological classifications within a river system?
【24h】

Spatial and temporal variability of diatom and macroinvertebrate communities: How representative are ecological classifications within a river system?

机译:硅藻和大型无脊椎动物群落的时空变化:河流系统内的生态分类如何具有代表性?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Evaluation of river condition is complicated by dynamic relationships between river assemblages and their environment. We assessed variation of ecological status classifications of stream diatom and macroinvertebrate communities within a boreal river system. We specifically examined whether results of ecological classifications are concordant across taxonomic groups and among main channel and headwater side tributaries of this river system. We further assessed whether ecological classifications are stable from year to year and whether classifications show predictable relationships to major stres-sor gradients. The estimated ecological condition varied considerably among and between reaches of main channel and tributaries for both examined taxonomic groups. Ecological classifications also differed between the two taxonomic groups and were generally lower and temporally more variable for diatoms. Ecological Quality Ratios (EQR) of the metrics were mainly related to pH representing a major disturbance gradient in our study, but in general, relationships to stressor gradients were weak. Our results suggest that ecological classifications could be weakly extrapolated among sites and, depending on the taxonomic group, also among different years in river systems disturbed by anthropogenic activities. Spatially and temporally extensive monitoring is therefore needed to reliably classify ecological condition of a water body. With this regard, it would be important to assess and monitor whole river networks instead of linear segments of large rivers.
机译:河流状况与环境之间的动态关系使河流状况的评估变得复杂。我们评估了北方河道系统中溪流硅藻和大型无脊椎动物群落生态状况分类的变化。我们专门检查了生态分类的结果是否在不同分类组之间以及该河流系统的主要河道和源头侧支流之间是否一致。我们进一步评估了生态分类每年是否稳定,以及分类是否显示与主要strs-sor梯度的可预测关系。对于这两个被检查的生物分类群,估计的生态条件在主要河道和支流之间以及之间有很大差异。两个分类组之间的生态分类也有所不同,并且硅藻的生态分类通常较低,时间上的变化较大。在我们的研究中,指标的生态质量比(EQR)主要与代表主要干扰梯度的pH值有关,但总的来说,与压力梯度的关系较弱。我们的结果表明,在生态系统分类中,可能会在地点之间以及根据分类学类别,在受人为活动干扰的河流系统的不同年份之间进行弱推断。因此,需要进行时空上广泛的监视以可靠地对水体的生态状况进行分类。因此,重要的是评估和监测整个河网,而不是大河的线性部分。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ecological indicators》 |2012年第2012期|p.208-216|共9页
  • 作者单位

    University of Oulu, Thule Institute. P.O. Box 7300, FIN 90014. Finland;

    Water Resources and Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Department of Process and Environmental Engineering. University of Oulu, P.O. Box 4300, FIN-90014, Finland;

    Finnish Environment Institute, Freshwater Centre, University of Oulu, P.O. Box413, FIN-90014. Finland;

    Jacobs Engineering UK Ltd.. Kenneth Dibben House, Enterprise Road, Southampton Science Park, Southampton, UK;

    University of jyvaskyla. Department of Biological and Environmental Science, P.O. Box 35, FIN-40014, Finland;

    Finnish Environment Institute, Freshwater Centre, University of Oulu, P.O. Box413, FIN-90014. Finland;

    Water Resources and Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Department of Process and Environmental Engineering. University of Oulu, P.O. Box 4300, FIN-90014, Finland;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    bioassessment; biomonitoring; community structure; ecological condition; water framework directive;

    机译:生物评估生物监测社区结构;生态状况水框架指令;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号