...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Sustainability assessment of salmonid feed using energy, classical exergy and eco-exergy analysis
【24h】

Sustainability assessment of salmonid feed using energy, classical exergy and eco-exergy analysis

机译:利用能量,经典火用和生态用火分析进行鲑鱼饲料的可持续性评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Reduction of the environmental impact of feed products is of paramount importance for salmon farming. This article explores the potential to compare three thermodynamically based ecological indicators. The environmental impact of partial replAccment offish meal (FM) and fish oil with alternative ingredients was investigated using energy, classical exergy and eco-exergy analysis. Seven hypothetical feeds were formulated: one with high levels of FM and fish oil, four feeds based on plant ingredients, one containing krill meal, and one based on algae-derived products. Analysis included cultivation of crops and algae, fishing for fish and krill, industrial processing of these ingredients and production of complete fish feed. Because most harvested products are refined in multiple product outputs that have good value to society, two scenarios were compared. In the base case scenario, no allocation of co-products was used and all the environmental costs were ascribed to one specific co-product. Co-product allocation by mass was used in the second scenario; this is considered to be the preferred scenario because it accurately reflects the individual contributions of the co-products to the environmental impact of the feed products. For this scenario, the total energy consumption for a fish-based diet was 14,500 MJ, which was similar to a krill diet (15,600 MJ), about 15-31% higher than plant-based diets, and 9% higher than an algae diet. Substituting FM and fish oil with alternative ingredients resulted in minor changes in total classical exergy degradation (2-16% difference). The calculations based on energy only consider the energy conservation based on the First Law of Thermodynamics, whereas those based on classical exergy also takes the Second Law of Thermodynamics into account; energy that can do work is distinguished from energy that is lost as heat to the environment. The calculations based on eco-exergy consider the total loss of work energy in the environment including the work energy associated with the information embodied in the genomes of organisms. The diet based on fishery-derived ingredients was the highest total work energy consumer compared with plant-based diets (24-30% greater), the diet containing krill meal (25% greater), and the algae diet (four times higher). Thus, reducing FM and fish oil levels in fish feed can contribute significantly to more sustainable aquaculture. In particular, algae-derived products in aquafeeds could drastically decrease environmental costs in the future.
机译:减少饲料产品对环境的影响对于鲑鱼养殖至关重要。本文探讨了比较三种基于热力学的生态指标的潜力。使用能量,经典火用和生态火用分析研究了用替代成分部分替代鱼粉(FM)和鱼油的环境影响。配制了7种假设的饲料:一种含有高水平的FM和鱼油,四种基于植物成分的饲料,一种含磷虾粉,一种基于藻类产品。分析包括农作物和藻类的种植,鱼和磷虾的捕捞,这些成分的工业加工以及完整鱼饲料的生产。由于大多数收割的产品都经过提炼,制成了对社会具有良好价值的多种产品,因此比较了两种情况。在基本情况下,不使用副产品分配,所有环境成本都归因于一种特定的副产品。在第二种情况下使用了按质量分配的联产品。这被认为是首选方案,因为它可以准确反映副产品对饲料产品对环境的影响。在这种情况下,以鱼为基础的饮食的总能量消耗为14,500 MJ,与磷虾饮食(15,600 MJ)相似,比以植物为基础的饮食高约15-31%,比藻类饮食高9% 。用替代成分替代FM和鱼油会导致总经典火用降解的微小变化(相差2-16%)。基于能量的计算仅考虑基于热力学第一定律的能量守恒,而基于经典火用的计算也考虑了热力学第二定律。可以做功的能量与作为热量散失到环境的能量是有区别的。基于生态能值的计算考虑了环境中的总工作能量损失,包括与生物体基因组中包含的信息相关的工作能量。与以植物为基础的饮食(增加24-30%),以磷虾粉为饮食(增加25%)和以藻类为饮食(高四倍)相比,基于渔业成分的饮食是最高的总工作能量消耗者。因此,降低鱼饲料中的FM和鱼油含量可以大大促进更可持续的水产养殖。特别是,水产饲料中的藻类衍生产品将来可能会大大降低环境成本。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ecological indicators》 |2013年第11期|277-289|共13页
  • 作者单位

    SkrettingAquaculture Research Centre, P.O. Box 48,4001 Stavanger, Norway,Laboratory of Food Process Engineering, Wageningen University, Bomenweg 2, 6703 HD Wageningen, The Netherlands;

    Faculty of Health, Institute A, Section of Environmental Chemistry, Copenhagen University, University Park 2,2100 Copenhagen, Denmark;

    Laboratory of Food Process Engineering, Wageningen University, Bomenweg 2, 6703 HD Wageningen, The Netherlands;

    SkrettingAquaculture Research Centre, P.O. Box 48,4001 Stavanger, Norway;

    SkrettingAquaculture Research Centre, P.O. Box 48,4001 Stavanger, Norway;

    Laboratory of Food Process Engineering, Wageningen University, Bomenweg 2, 6703 HD Wageningen, The Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Fish feed; Aquaculture; Sustainability; Energy; Classical exergy; Eco-exergy; Fish meal; Plant proteins;

    机译:鱼饲料;水产养殖;可持续发展;能源;经典的火力;生态利用鱼粉植物蛋白;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号