...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Economics >Impacts of natural resource management technologies on agricultural yield and household income: The system of rice intensification in Timor Leste
【24h】

Impacts of natural resource management technologies on agricultural yield and household income: The system of rice intensification in Timor Leste

机译:自然资源管理技术对农业产量和家庭收入的影响:东帝汶的稻米集约化制度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Natural resource management (NRM) technologies, such as the system of rice intensification (SRI), have been proposed to tackle agricultural challenges such as decreasing productivity growth and environmental degradation. Yet, the benefits of NRM technologies for farmers are often debated. Impacts seem to be context-specific, which are especially relevant in the small farm sector with its large degree of agroecological and socioeconomic heterogeneity. This was not always considered in previous research. We analyze the impacts of SRI adoption on rice yield and household income among smallholder farmers in Timor Leste. Heterogeneity is accounted for in an endogenous switching regression framework. Comparing mean yield and income levels, we find no significant differences between SRI adopters and non-adopters. This is due to negative selection bias; SRI seems to be adopted more on plots and by farmers with less than average yields. Controlling for this bias reveals significant yield and income gains. Poor and non-poor households benefit from SRI adoption; small farms benefit more than larger farms. The results also suggest that in the context of Timor Leste SRI may not be beneficial when compared to conventional rice grown under favorable conditions. Some implications for future research are discussed.
机译:已经提出了自然资源管理(NRM)技术,例如稻米集约化(SRI)系统,以应对农业挑战,例如生产力下降和环境恶化。然而,人们经常争论NRM技术对农民的好处。影响似乎是因地制宜的,这在农业生态和社会经济异质性很大的小型农业部门中尤为重要。在以前的研究中并不总是考虑到这一点。我们分析了在东帝汶小农户采用SRI对水稻产量和家庭收入的影响。异质性是在内生转换回归框架中解决的。比较平均收益率和收入水平,我们发现SRI采用者和非采用者之间没有显着差异。这是由于负的选择偏见所致; SRI似乎更多地用于田地和单产低于平均水平的农民。控制这种偏见可以显示出显着的收益和收入增长。贫困和非贫困家庭受益于采用SRI;小农场比大农场受益更多。结果还表明,在东帝汶,与在有利条件下种植的常规水稻相比,SRI可能无益。讨论了对未来研究的一些启示。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ecological Economics》 |2013年第1期|59-68|共10页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Ceorg-August-University of Goettingen, Platz der Goettinger Sieben 5,37073 Goettingen, Germany;

    Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Ceorg-August-University of Goettingen, Platz der Goettinger Sieben 5,37073 Goettingen, Germany;

    Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Ceorg-August-University of Goettingen, Platz der Goettinger Sieben 5,37073 Goettingen, Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    impact assessment; endogenous switching regression; smallholder farmers; SRI; timor leste;

    机译:影响评估;内生转换回归小农SRI;东帝汶;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号