首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Economics >Developing an analytical framework for reconstructing the scalar reorganization of water governance as institutional change: The case of Southern Spain
【24h】

Developing an analytical framework for reconstructing the scalar reorganization of water governance as institutional change: The case of Southern Spain

机译:建立一个分析框架,以重建水治理的规模重组,将其作为制度变迁:以西班牙南部为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Relying on theories of institutional change, a framework is developed to explain formal change in natural resource governance, in this case, formal scalar reorganization (re-scaling) of governance. Modifications of water governance are the outcome of interrelated changes in the determinants of actor-specific perceptions of costs and benefits of governance. To become effective, actors need to be able to bring their preferences to bear on constitutionally defined action situations where collective bargaining processes over governance take shape. Rescaling is conceptualized as being about whose economic interests are able to control the processes by which rescaling is advocated and carried out and whose technically, economically, or politically oriented vision of water management prevails. The framework developed goes beyond the alternatives of either functionalist problem-solving approaches or approaches focussing on political bargaining. Its application is illustrated through an in-depth qualitative case study of decentralization of governance in Spain's Guadalquivir river basin. Here, rescaling resulted from some politically dominant regional actors favoring better coordination of water management with regional environmental management and greater control of water and coincided with a political two-level majority at the national and regional levels. The case highlights the role of relations between institutional arrangements and biophysical settings, such as the specific geographical setting and changes in the relative importance of characteristics of the nature-related transactions, implicit, for example, in the changing relative importance groundwater management at the expense of surface water management.
机译:依靠制度变迁的理论,开发了一个框架来解释自然资源治理中的正式变化,在这种情况下,是治理的正式标量重组(重新定标)。对水治理的修改是各行为者对治理成本和收益的看法的决定因素相互关联变化的结果。要想发挥作用,行动者必须能够顺应宪法规定的行动情况,在这种情况下,集体谈判过程就形成了治理。重新定标的概念是关于谁的经济利益能够控制提倡和执行重新定标的过程,以及关于水管理的技术,经济或政治取向的观点占上风。开发的框架超越了功能主义解决问题的方法或侧重于政治谈判的方法的替代方案。通过对西班牙瓜达基维尔河流域治理权力下放的深入定性案例研究,说明了其应用。在这里,重新定标是由于一些政治上占主导地位的区域行为者主张更好地将水管理与区域环境管理协调起来,并加强对水的控制,并且恰逢国家和区域两级政治多数。该案例强调了制度安排与生物物理环境之间的关系的作用,例如特定的地理环境以及与自然有关的交易的特征的相对重要性的变化,例如,隐含在改变相对重要性的地下水管理中的代价。地表水管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号