首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Economics >In markets we trust? Setting the boundaries of Market-Based Instruments in ecosystem services governance
【24h】

In markets we trust? Setting the boundaries of Market-Based Instruments in ecosystem services governance

机译:在市场上我们信任吗?在生态系统服务治理中设定基于市场的工具的界限

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A growing tendency to frame environmental problems as a failure to price ecosystem services has coincided with the rise of so-called "Market-Based Instruments" (MBIs). The aim of this introductory article to the special section "In markets we trust? Contrasting views on the performance and legitimacy of Market-Based Instruments in global environmental governance" is to promote critical reflection about the nature, scope and limits of MBIs in ecosystem services governance and to provide guidance on where the boundaries for the application of markets ought to be set. First, we examine the role that methodological assumptions and implicit normative positions play in shaping academic perception of the effectiveness and legitimacy of MBIs. Second, we examine MBIs in the broader ideological context and socio-political processes that have favored their development and implementation. Third, we test claims of the literature on MBIs against insights and data from case studies presented in the special section. Fourth, we discuss the scope and limits of markets in ecosystem services governance in the light of biophysical, institutional, and normative boundaries. We end with a summary of concluding remarks from the special section and by identifying critical tasks for the scientific and policy agenda on ecosystem services governance. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:将环境问题归结为无法为生态系统服务定价的趋势越来越大,这与所谓的“基于市场的工具”(MBI)的兴起相吻合。本简介文章旨在“在我们信任的市场中?对基于市场的工具在全球环境治理中的表现和合法性的不同观点”这一特殊部分的目的是促进对生态系统服务中MBI的性质,范围和限制的批判性反思。治理并就应该在哪里设定市场应用的界限提供指导。首先,我们研究了方法论假设和隐含的规范立场在塑造对MBI有效性和合法性的学术认识中的作用。其次,我们在有利于其发展和实施的更广泛的意识形态背景和社会政治进程中研究了MBI。第三,我们根据在特殊部分中提出的案例研究的见解和数据,测试了MBI文献的主张。第四,我们根据生物物理,制度和规范性边界讨论了生态系统服务治理市场的范围和局限性。最后,我们总结了本节的总结,并确定了有关生态系统服务治理的科学和政策议程的关键任务。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号