...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Economics >Aligning 'public good' environmental stewardship with the landscape-scale: Adapting MBIs for private land conservation policy
【24h】

Aligning 'public good' environmental stewardship with the landscape-scale: Adapting MBIs for private land conservation policy

机译:使“公益”环境管理与景观尺度保持一致:使MBI适应私人土地保护政策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Market-based instruments (MBIs) are rapidly becoming a dominant characteristic of the policy landscape for private land conservation in Australia and elsewhere. Price-based MBIs are considered attractive to landholders, who are provided with financial payments for the delivery of defined ecological outcomes on their land, and for policy-making, where ecological return on investment can be measured quantitatively. Consequently, MBIs are commonly used to promote competitive, individualized approaches to improve ecological values, framed around the property-scale. We are concerned that there is a tension between the property-centric focus of price-based MBI programs and the need for environmental management policy and practice to reflect landscape-scale social-ecological processes. Targeting MBI programs at individual properties could risk generating insufficient public good conservation benefits, if those programs fail to reflect the relationship between landscape-scale processes and property-scale conservation efforts. To remedy the neglect of the landscape scale in private land conservation MBI policy, we develop a definition of stewardship that directly connects landscape-scale ecological function to the 'public good' dimension of stewardship. We apply this over-arching definition to demonstrate how MBI programs can deliver on the goal of landscape-scale conservation, and to suggest when MBIs might not be well suited to achieving private land conservation objectives. (c) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:市场手段(MBI)正迅速成为澳大利亚及其他地区私有土地保护政策格局的主要特征。以价格为基础的MBI被认为对土地所有者有吸引力,因为土地所有者可以在土地上交付确定的生态成果并进行政策制定,从而可以定量地衡量生态投资回报,从而获得财政补贴。因此,MBI通常用于促进竞争性,个性化的方法来提高生态价值,这种方法围绕房地产规模展开。我们关注的是,以价格为基础的MBI计划以房地产为中心的重点与需要环境管理政策和实践以反映景观尺度的社会生态过程之间存在紧张关系。如果MBI计划针对个体财产,则可能会产生无法产生充分的公共利益保护收益的风险,如果这些计划无法反映景观尺度过程与财产尺度保护努力之间的关系。为了弥补对私人土地保护MBI政策中景观尺度的忽视,我们制定了管理权定义,将景观尺度的生态功能与管理权的“公益”维度直接联系起来。我们采用这一总体定义来说明MBI计划如何实现景观规模保护的目标,并建议MBI何时不适合实现私有土地保护的目标。 (c)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号