首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Economics >The sharing economy: A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism?
【24h】

The sharing economy: A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism?

机译:共享经济:通向可持续性的道路还是新自由主义资本主义的噩梦形式?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The sharing economy seemingly encompasses, online peer-to-peer economic activities as diverse as rental (Airbnb), for-profit service provision (Uber), and gifting (Freecycle). The Silicon Valley success stories of Airbnb and Uber have catalysed a vibrant sharing economy discourse, participated in by the media, incumbent industries, entrepreneurs and grassroots activists. Within this discourse the sharing economy is framed in contradictory ways; ranging from a potential pathway to sustainability, to a nightmarish form of neoliberalism. However, these framings share a common vision of the sharing economy (a niche of innovation) decentralising and disrupting established socio-technical and economic structures (regimes). Here I present an analysis of the online sharing economy discourse; identifying that the sharing economy is framed as: (1) an economic opportunity; (2) a more sustainable form of consumption; (3) a pathway to a decentralised, equitable and sustainable economy; (4) creating unregulated marketplaces; (5) reinforcing the neoliberal paradigm; and, (6) an incoherent field of innovation. Although a critique of hyper-consumption was central to emergence of the sharing economy niche (2), it has been successfully reframed by regime actors as purely an economic opportunity (1). If the sharing economy follows this pathway of corporate co-option it appears unlikely to drive a transition to sustainability. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:共享经济似乎涵盖了在线对等经济活动,包括租金(Airbnb),营利性服务提供(Uber)和礼品(Freecycle)。硅谷关于Airbnb和Uber的成功故事激发了一种充满活力的共享经济话语,媒体,现有行业,企业家和基层活动家参加了会议。在这种论述中,共享经济是相互矛盾的。从潜在的可持续发展途径到新自由主义的噩梦形式。然而,这些框架对共享经济(创新的利基)的共同愿景是权力下放和破坏既定的社会技术和经济结构(制度)。在这里,我对在线共享经济话语进行分析。确定共享经济的框架为:(1)经济机会; (2)更可持续的消费形式; (3)通往分散,公平和可持续经济的途径; (4)建立不受管制的市场; (5)加强新自由主义范式; (6)创新领域不连贯。尽管对过度消费的批判对于共享经济利基的出现至关重要(2),但它已被政权参与者成功地重组为纯粹的经济机会(1)。如果共享经济遵循公司选择的这种方式,那么似乎不太可能推动向可持续性的过渡。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号