...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Economics >Measuring development with inequality: How (should) aggregate indicators of development account for inequality?
【24h】

Measuring development with inequality: How (should) aggregate indicators of development account for inequality?

机译:用不平等衡量发展:总的发展指标如何(不应该)解释不平等?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The paper analyzes how inequality is accounted for in aggregate indicators of development and whether and how it should be used. The motivation behind the study stems from the renewed interest in inequality in academia, public discourse, and in global policy. First, we argue that inequality should be considered when constructing development indicators. The role of distribution in development is important both because people generally prefer lower inequality and inequality tends to have negative effects on development outcomes. Second, we analyze how ten selected development indicators account for inequality (in terms of justification, type of inequality, measure of inequality, and method of incorporation) and what the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches are. We found considerable diversity especially for inequality measures and methods of incorporation. As for the type of inequality, inequality of opportunities is considered marginally and overlapping inequalities not at all; increasing data availability opens the door for inclusion especially for the latter aspect. As most indicators suffer from insufficient methodological substantiation, we argue for increased clarity regarding why and how inequality is accounted for in development indicators. The analysis is complemented by a detailed review of treatment of inequality by the analyzed indicators (Annex).
机译:本文分析了如何在总体发展指标中考虑不平等以及是否以及如何使用不平等。该研究背后的动机来自对学术界,公共话语和全球政策中的不平等的重新关注。首先,我们认为在建立发展指标时应考虑不平等。分配在发展中的作用很重要,因为人们通常偏爱较低的不平等,而不平等往往会对发展成果产生负面影响。其次,我们分析了十种选定的发展指标如何解决不平等问题(根据合理性,不平等类型,不平等程度的衡量方法以及纳入方法)以及不同方法的优缺点是什么。我们发现了相当多的多样性,特别是在不平等措施和合并方法方面。至于不平等的类型,机会不平等只被微不足道地考虑,重叠的不平等根本没有。数据可用性的提高为包容性打开了大门,尤其是对于后一个方面。由于大多数指标缺乏足够的方法论依据,因此我们争辩说,对于为什么以及如何在发展指标中解决不平等问题应更加明确。通过对所分析指标进行的不平等待遇的详细审查,可以补充该分析(附件)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号