...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics >Politicians Versus Intellectuals in the Lustration Debates in Transitional Latvia
【24h】

Politicians Versus Intellectuals in the Lustration Debates in Transitional Latvia

机译:政治家对知识分子在过渡拉脱维亚的经济辩论中

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The process of transitional justice in Latvia after 1991 and the public debates that surrounded it created a number of controversies. One such notable conflict dealt with lustration, and it involved Latvia's political establishment and intelligentsia. While the politicians supported the public's right to have full access to the secret KGB files, the intellectuals demanded that Latvia's society should be protected from making mistakes in its judgments and therefore the available documentation should be studied first by state-appointed experts. Each position addressed the issue of lustration from a distinctive perspective, and these reflected not merely political disagreements. Instead, they reflected conflicts of vision that had deep historical roots.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13523279.2010.496327
机译:1991年之后的拉脱维亚过渡时期司法程序以及围绕该程序的公开辩论引起了许多争议。这样的显着冲突之一是与欲望有关,它牵涉到拉脱维亚的政治地位和知识分子。尽管政客们支持公众有权完全访问KGB秘密文件,但知识分子要求拉脱维亚的社会在作出判断时应避免犯错误,因此,应首先由国家指定的专家研究可用的文档。每个职位都从独特的角度解决了精疲力尽的问题,这不仅反映了政治分歧。取而代之的是,它们反映了具有深厚历史渊源的愿景冲突。 digg,google,more“,发布号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13523279.2010.496327

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号