首页> 外文期刊>Early Popular Visual Culture >Imperial narratives displaced by Indian subaltern identities in early amateur films
【24h】

Imperial narratives displaced by Indian subaltern identities in early amateur films

机译:在早期的业余电影中,印度叙事身份取代了帝国叙事

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article analyses how representations of Indian people in colonial amateur films from the 1920s challenged and displaced imperial narratives. It explores how conventional visual colonial rhetoric allowed typological (mis)representations of Indian people, and how these can often voice a suppressed collective history outside the films' customary early twentieth century imperial narrative on race and indigenous traditions. It discusses how British and Indian amateur filmmakers employed visual tropes of colonial discourse on race and identity when constructing, controlling and (mis)representing Indian identities as ‘criminal’ tribes, ‘savage’ colonial subjects, members of esoteric groups, and as members of the imperial elite. Most British amateur filmmakers modelled their records after colonial picture postcards of India or ethnographic and travelogue films, and supported Britain's ‘civilizing’ imperialism by portraying Indian people within a ‘primitive’ romanticised colonial locus. Some Indian amateur filmmakers often employed the journalistic style of British actualities (newsreels) across their entire collections and especially when recording state visits and durbars. Drawing on theoretical perspectives borrowed from the subaltern studies framework, this paper investigates issues of Indian racial and gender agency in four colonial amateur films, and argues that the visual (mis)representation of several Indian subaltern identities ultimately cancels conventional imperial narratives. The research corpus includes missionary films, ethnographic travelogues and home movies made by Anglican missionaries, British ethnographers and freemasons and Maharajahs in the late 1920s. These examples belong to film collections held by the British Film Institute, the Centre of South Asian Studies (University of Cambridge) and the British Empire & Commonwealth Museum.View full textDownload full textKeywordssubaltern identities, subaltern studies, colonial amateur filmmaking, imperial narratives, British RajRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17460654.2011.571036
机译:本文分析了1920年代殖民业余电影中印度人的形象如何挑战和流离失所的帝国叙事。它探讨了传统的视觉殖民修辞是如何允许印度人进行类型(虚假)表现的,以及这些行为通常如何在电影关于种族和土著传统的20世纪初帝国主义叙事之外发声压抑的集体历史。它讨论了英国和印度的业余电影摄制者在构建,控制和(错误地)将印度身份表示为“犯罪”部落,“野蛮”殖民主体,深奥成员时如何利用种族和身份的殖民话语的视觉取向。团体,并作为帝国精英的成员。大多数英国业余电影制片人以印度的殖民地照片明信片或民族志和旅行电影作为原型,并通过在“原始的”浪漫化殖民地中刻画印度人来支持英国的“文明”帝国主义。一些印度业余电影制片人经常在整个收藏中采用英国现实(新闻片)的新闻风格,尤其是在记录国事访问和杜巴唱片时。本文从次要研究框架中借鉴了理论观点,研究了四部殖民业余电影中的印度种族和性别代理问题,并认为几种印度次要身份的视觉(虚假)表示最终取消了传统的帝国叙事。研究资料集包括1920年代后期由圣公会传教士,英国人种志研究者,共济会和共济会和王公制作的宣教片,民族志游记和家庭影片。这些示例属于英国电影学院,南亚研究中心(剑桥大学)和大英帝国与英联邦博物馆收藏的电影作品集。查看全文下载全文关键词次要身份,次要研究,殖民地业余电影制作,帝国叙事,英国RajRelated var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17460654.2011.571036

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号