首页> 外文期刊>Early Child Development and Care >A comparative study on the effectiveness of two song-teaching methods: holistic vs. phrase-by-phrase
【24h】

A comparative study on the effectiveness of two song-teaching methods: holistic vs. phrase-by-phrase

机译:两种歌曲教学方法的整体效果对比:逐句与逐短语

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The purpose of our study was to compare the effectiveness of two song-teaching methods: holistic and phrase-by-phrase. Thirty-two first-grade children (n = 32) from two music classes in an urban elementary school were taught two folksongs. The first class (n = 16) was taught one song through the phrase-by-phrase method and another song through the holistic method. The second class (n = 16) was taught the same songs using the reverse teaching procedure. Following one week of teaching, each child was individually recorded performing both songs. Comparisons were made using an analysis of variance for differences between classes, songs and types of errors. Results indicated that while children sang the songs using the holistic method with fewer errors than with the phrase-by-phrase method, this difference was not significant. The most errors were pitch inaccuracies while fewest errors were rhythmic.
机译:我们研究的目的是比较两种歌曲教学方法的有效性:整体和逐句。在城市小学的两个音乐课上对32名一年级孩子(n = 32)进行了两次民歌教学。第一堂课(n = 16)通过逐句教学法教给一首歌,而通过整体教学法教给另一首歌。第二节课(n = 16)使用相反的教学过程教了同样的歌曲。经过一周的教学,每个孩子分别录制了两首歌。使用方差分析比较类别,歌曲和错误类型之间的差异。结果表明,虽然儿童使用整体方法唱歌的歌曲比使用逐词短语方法的歌曲错误少,但这种差异并不明显。最多的错误是音高不准确,而最少的错误是有节奏的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号