首页> 外文期刊>Documenta Ophthalmologica >Inter-subject, inter-ocular and inter-session repeatability of the photopic negative response of the electroretinogram recorded using DTL and skin electrodes
【24h】

Inter-subject, inter-ocular and inter-session repeatability of the photopic negative response of the electroretinogram recorded using DTL and skin electrodes

机译:使用DTL和皮肤电极记录的视网膜电图的明视负响应的受试者间,眼间和会话间重复性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The photopic negative response (PhNR) has attracted interest as a flash ERG component reflecting inner retinal activity, with investigators adopting various approaches to analysing the response. This study has two principal aims: first to determine the most reliable technique for assessing the PhNR amplitude; secondly to compare the repeatability characteristics of the PhNR recorded using DTL and skin active electrodes. Electroretinograms were recorded in 31 subjects, using both electrode types, in response to a Ganzfeld red stimulus (Lee filter “bright red”; 1.76 log phot td.s; 4 Hz) presented over a steady blue background (Schott glass filter BG28; 3.9 log scot td). Sixteen subjects returned to assess repeatability. PhNR amplitude was measured from b-wave peak-to-PhNR trough, pre-stimulus baseline to trough, and from peak and baseline to a fixed time-point; a ratio of b-wave/PhNR amplitude was also calculated. Coefficients of variation (CoV), and inter-ocular and inter-session limits of agreement (LoA) were calculated for all measures. The ratio of b-wave/PhNR amplitude showed the lowest CoV (14.3% DTL; 23.2% skin), inter-ocular LoA (22.2% DTL; 25.0% skin), and inter-session LoA (22.8% DTL; 20.3% skin). The peak-to-trough and peak-to-fixed-time measurements were also consistently reliable. Least reliable measures were those measured from baseline. While skin electrode responses were significantly smaller than DTL responses (P < 0.0001), the variability was only slightly increased. This study suggests that peak-to-trough measurements are the most reliable means of measuring the PhNR and ratio calculation further improves repeatability. Skin electrodes provided a viable alternative to DTL electrodes for recording the PhNR.
机译:视觉阴性反应(PhNR)作为反映视网膜内部活动的快速ERG组件引起了人们的兴趣,研究人员采用了各种方法来分析反应。这项研究有两个主要目标:第一,确定评估PhNR振幅的最可靠技术;其次比较使用DTL和皮肤活性电极记录的PhNR的重复性特征。记录了31种受试者的视网膜电图,使用了两种电极类型,响应了在稳定的蓝色背景(肖特玻璃滤镜BG28; 3.9)上呈现的甘兹费尔德红色刺激(李过滤器“亮红色”; 1.76 log phot td.s; 4 Hz)。原木苏格兰td)。 16位受试者返回以评估可重复性。从b波峰到PhNR谷,刺激前基线到谷以及从峰和基线到固定时间点测量PhNR振幅;还计算了b波/ PhNR振幅之比。计算所有度量的变异系数(CoV),眼间和会话间协议限制(LoA)。 b波/ PhNR振幅比显示最低CoV(14.3%DTL; 23.2%皮肤),眼间LoA(22.2%DTL; 25.0%皮肤)和会话间LoA(22.8%DTL; 20.3%皮肤) )。峰谷和峰谷固定时间的测量结果也始终可靠。最不可靠的措施是从基线开始测量的措施。尽管皮肤电极反应明显小于DTL反应(P <0.0001),但变异性仅略有增加。这项研究表明,峰谷测量是测量PhNR的最可靠方法,比率计算可进一步提高可重复性。皮肤电极为记录PhNR提供了一种可行的替代DTL电极的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号