首页> 外文期刊>Dialectical Anthropology >The structure of embodiment and the overcoming of dualism: an analysis of Margaret Lock’s paradigm of embodiment
【24h】

The structure of embodiment and the overcoming of dualism: an analysis of Margaret Lock’s paradigm of embodiment

机译:体现的结构与克服二元论:玛格丽特·洛克的体现范式分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper elaborates the structure of the dualistic theory and that of embodiment in order to demonstrate the existence of a linkage between the two using a topological approach. This theoretical step is taken in order to analyze the so-called overcoming of dualistic theories by the theory of embodiment. The author takes into analysis one particular theory of embodiment: Margaret Lock’s. The analysis of her theory of embodiment takes into consideration both the level of enunciation and the enunciated, which enables the conceptualisation and understanding of Lock’s subjectivity as immanent to her theory. The specific moral position taken by Lock, which is required by her ‘project,’ is not transcendental, but rather an effect of the structure of her theory. This approach enables the author to develop a critique that aims at developing further her theory rather than pragmatically negating it. The paper ends with the conclusion that the object of the overcoming is not the dualism itself, but the element called ‘Difference.’ This element belongs to the dualistic relation yet simultaneously cannot be integrated into the relation. Conversely, a theory of embodiment is faced with the same element (Difference), but the former finds another structural solution to it. In the claim of an overcoming of dualities, the theory of embodiment demonstrates a reactionary position in relation to Difference. Precisely this position produces the structural impossibility of accepting the fact that the actual problem is not to bridge Difference, but, rather, to formulate it as such.
机译:本文阐述了二元论理论和实施例的结构,以证明使用拓扑方法在两者之间存在联系。采取该理论步骤是为了通过实施例理论来分析所谓的二元论的克服。作者分析了一种特殊的体现理论:玛格丽特·洛克(Margaret Lock)。对她的体现理论的分析同时考虑了阐述的水平和阐述的水平,这使得对洛克的主观性进行概念化和理解成为她的理论所固有的。洛克的“项目”要求其采取特定的道德立场,这不是超越性的,而是她理论结构的影响。这种方法使作者能够提出一种批评,其目的是进一步发展其理论,而不是务实地否定它。本文的结论是,克服的对象不是二元论本身,而是“差异”元素。该元素属于二元关系,但不能同时整合到该关系中。相反,实施例理论面临着相同的要素(差异),但前者找到了另一种结构解决方案。在克服对偶性的主张中,实施例理论证明了与差异有关的反动立场。确切地讲,这种立场在结构上是不可能接受这样一个事实的,即实际问题不是弥合差异,而是将差异表述为如此。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号