首页> 外文期刊>Development and change >Huawei, 5G and Security: Technological Limitations and Political Responses
【24h】

Huawei, 5G and Security: Technological Limitations and Political Responses

机译:华为,5G和安全:技术限制和政治反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

How did Chinese 5G providers, such as Huawei, become a security concern in the USA and Europe? Were the security concerns related to 5G and Chinese suppliers based upon technological features of the systems, or were they a product of geopolitical rivalry? How did European approaches to 5G distinguish themselves from those of the USA? This article addresses these questions using an interdisciplinary approach via the framework of securitization theory. The authors argue that the technological features of 5G made securitization more likely compared to 4G, and that screening and control of software was unlikely to defuse securitization concerns. They also show how Europe chose its own path for the securitization of 5G. In short, the article argues that the American macrosecuritization of China largely failed in Europe, whereas the niche securitization of 5G was more successful.
机译:中国5G提供者(如华为)是如何成为美国和欧洲的安全问题? 基于系统的技术特征,是否与5G和中国供应商有关的安全问题,或者是他们是地缘政治竞争的产品吗? 欧洲对5G的方法是如何区分自己的美国? 本文通过证券化理论框架使用跨学科方法来解决这些问题。 作者认为,与4G相比,5G的技术特征更有可能更有可能,并且对软件的筛选和控制不太可能地消除证券化问题。 他们还展示了欧洲如何选择自己的路径为5G的证券化。 简而言之,文章认为,中国的美国宏观训练在很大程度上在欧洲失败,而5G的利基证券化更成功。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Development and change》 |2021年第5期|1174-1195|共22页
  • 作者

    Friis Karsten; Lysne Olav;

  • 作者单位

    Norwegian Inst Int Affairs NUPI Secur & Def Res Grp Oslo Norway;

    Oslo Metropolitan Univ Simula Metropolitan Oslo Norway|Oslo Metropolitan Univ Commun Syst Oslo Norway;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-19 03:09:42

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号