首页> 外文期刊>Development and change >Common Counsel, Common Policy: Healthcare, Missions and the Rise of the 'Voluntary Sector' in Colonial Tanzania
【24h】

Common Counsel, Common Policy: Healthcare, Missions and the Rise of the 'Voluntary Sector' in Colonial Tanzania

机译:共同法律顾问,共同政策:坦桑尼亚殖民地的医疗保健,使命和“自愿部门”的兴起

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Analysis of the voluntary sector in sub-Saharan Africa has tended to focus on the role of the NGO, and the types of relationships this institution establishes and maintains with donors, national governments and the communities with which they work. The voluntary sector in Africa is therefore usually defined through, and often treated as synonymous with, the institution of the NGO. As a result, the boundaries of understandings of the 'third sector' space occupied by the vast number of NGOs - its origins, the nature of the relationship of voluntary sector actors to the state, the types of organizations that characterize the sector - have tended to reflect a narrow concern with the NGO type and its experiences. This article suggests that this view is too narrow in its gaze. The voluntary sector was not a creation of a post-colonial (and especially post-1970s) development crisis. It emerged from an evolving relationship between colonial-era non-state (voluntary) actors and governments determined to demonstrate that they were meeting their commitments to the welfare of Africans under their charge. Missions and mission welfare services, expanding across much of rural sub-Saharan Africa by the beginnings of the twentieth century, and increasingly coordinated from the late 1920s and early 1930s, created the foundations for the emergence of sub-Saharan Africa's formal voluntary sector as it exists today. This matters for more than just historical accuracy. To understand the constraints, challenges and opportunities faced by NGOs, we need to move beyond a narrow focus on the institution of the NGO itself, and look in addition to the environment in which it operates: its history, its evolution and the shifts that created those conditions.
机译:对撒哈拉以南非洲地区志愿部门的分析往往侧重于非政府组织的作用,以及该机构与捐助者,各国政府以及与之合作的社区建立并维持的关系类型。因此,非洲的志愿部门通常是通过非政府组织的机构来定义的,并且通常被视为非政府组织的代名词。结果,对大量非政府组织所占据的“第三部门”空间的理解的界限-其起源,自愿性部门行为者与国家的关系的性质,表征该部门的组织类型-趋向于趋于一致。以反映对NGO类型及其经验的狭concern关注。本文表明,这种观点注视范围太窄。自愿部门并不是造成后殖民时期(尤其是1970年代后)发展危机的产物。它源于殖民时代的非国家(自愿)行为者与政府之间不断发展的关系,这些政府决心表明他们正在履行其所负责的对非洲人福祉的承诺。传教士和传教福利服务在20世纪初扩展到整个撒哈拉以南非洲农村地区,并在1920年代末和1930年代初越来越协调,为撒哈拉以南非洲的正式志愿部门的兴起奠定了基础。今天存在。这不仅仅是历史准确性。为了理解非政府组织面临的制约,挑战和机遇,我们需要超越对NGO本身机构的狭narrow关注,并要关注其运作的环境:其历史,演变和所产生的转变这些条件。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Development and change》 |2013年第4期|939-963|共25页
  • 作者

    Michael Jennings;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Development Studies at SOAS, University of London, Thornhaugh Street, Russell Square, London, WC1H 0XG, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号