首页> 外文期刊>Development and change >Taking Natural Limits Seriously: Implications for Development Studies and the Environment
【24h】

Taking Natural Limits Seriously: Implications for Development Studies and the Environment

机译:认真对待自然极限:对发展研究和环境的启示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article explores how thinking about ecological limits, thresholds and boundaries has evolved in the last few decades, and explores the analytical and political possibilities that emerge if development studies scholars engage with these ideas. It makes the case for an engaged political economy approach, which focuses on understanding how finite resources at a variety of scales are shared between the competing claims of different groups in society. The article suggests that, while the science of planetary limits is important, the most significant societal challenges are not about how close we are to the limits, but involve finding mechanisms to reconcile the difficult trade-offs that inevitably arise when we consider alternative human pathways in the present and the future. Choices are ubiquitous, even when there may be no immediate ecological tipping point, and a political economy perspective focuses on the ways in which humanity prioritizes different, often irreconcilable, objectives and interests in relation to the environment. The productive consequence of this thinking for development studies is the need for a renewed focus on the key issues that define prosperity and well-being, as well as the political and moral economy within which human society governs itself, and its relationships with nature.
机译:本文探讨了在过去的几十年中对生态极限,阈值和界限的思考是如何演变的,并探讨了如果发展研究学者采用这些思想,就会出现分析和政治上的可能性。它为采取积极的政治经济学方法提供了依据,该方法侧重于理解社会中不同群体的相互竞争的主张如何共享各种规模的有限资源。该文章建议,尽管行星极限的科学很重要,但最重大的社会挑战并不在于我们离极限有多近,而是涉及寻找机制来调和在我们考虑人类替代途径时不可避免地出现的艰难折衷在现在和将来。即使没有立即的生态临界点,选择也是无处不在的,而政治经济学的观点则侧重于人类优先考虑与环境相关的不同的,往往是不可调和的目标和利益的方式。这种思维方式对发展研究产生的结果是,需要重新关注定义繁荣和福祉的关键问题,以及人类社会在其内部进行统治的政治和道德经济及其与自然的关系。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Development and change》 |2015年第4期|762-776|共15页
  • 作者

    Vira Bhaskar;

  • 作者单位

    Univ Cambridge, Dept Geog, Polit Econ Environm & Dev, Cambridge CB2 3EN, England|Univ Cambridge, Conservat Res Inst, Cambridge CB2 1TN, England;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:39:32

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号