...
首页> 外文期刊>JMIR formative research. >Copyright as a Barrier to Music Therapy Telehealth Interventions: Qualitative Interview Study
【24h】

Copyright as a Barrier to Music Therapy Telehealth Interventions: Qualitative Interview Study

机译:版权作为音乐治疗远程医疗干预措施的障碍:定性面试学习

获取原文

摘要

Background Music therapy is a multifaceted discipline that harnesses the power of music to treat a wide range of patient populations. A therapist who plays music in a private room for a patient is not subject to copyright restrictions on public performances. However, in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, music therapy is no longer strictly confined to the face-to-face setting. This study explores music therapists’ perceptions of copyright law with respect to their ability to provide mediated services to their clients. Objective The objectives of our study were two-fold. The first was to investigate whether concerns about copyright law are hampering the diffusion of telehealth innovations, and the second was whether these concerns are causing music therapists to avoid therapeutically beneficial telehealth interventions. Methods Semistructured interviews were conducted with credentialed music therapists (n=18) in the United States between May 2020 and June 2020. With participants’ consent, we used video conference technology to record and transcribe the in-depth interviews. The median interview length was 45 (SD 16.37) minutes. This theoretically informed study employed thematic analysis of the interview data. Results The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of telehealth interventions to facilitate therapy outside of private face-to-face environments: environments where music therapy practices are largely shielded from copyright infringement concerns. Five main themes emerged, including therapists’ uncertainty about permissible uses of music and therapists’ erring on the side of caution causing lost opportunities for care. Our interview data suggest music therapists have altered telehealth interventions in suboptimal ways to avoid copyright liability in a physically distanced environment. Conclusions Some music therapists “drag their feet” on offering therapeutically appropriate telehealth services to clients because of copyright concerns. Our findings suggest innovative mediated therapies were shied away from or abandoned. These findings offer a novel contribution to the public health literature by highlighting copyright law as an unexpected and unwelcome barrier to the diffusion of music therapy practices in technology-mediated settings.
机译:背景技术音乐疗法是一种多方面的纪律,利用音乐的力量来治疗各种患者人口。在患者的私人房间中播放音乐的治疗师并不受公共表演的版权限制。然而,在Covid-19大流行之后,音乐疗法不再严格限制在面对面的环境中。本研究探讨了音乐治疗师对版权法的看法,了解他们向客户提供介导服务的能力。客观我们研究的目标是两倍。首先是调查版权法的担忧是否阻碍了远程健康创新的扩散,第二个是这些问题是造成音乐治疗师以避免治疗有益的远程健康干预措施。方法在2020年5月20日和6月20日期间,在美国的资格音乐治疗师(N = 18)进行了半系统的访谈。与参与者同意,我们使用视频会议技术来记录和转录深入的访谈。中位面试长度为45(SD 16.37)分钟。在理论上知情的研究采用对面试数据的主题分析。结果Covid-19大流行加速了通过遥控干预的采用,以促进私人面对面环境之外的治疗:音乐治疗措施主要涉及版权侵权问题的环境。出现了五个主要主题,包括治疗师对音乐和治疗师的允许使用的不确定性,在谨慎方面犯错误,导致丢失的照顾机会。我们的采访数据建议音乐治疗师以廉价的方式改变了遥控的措施,以避免在物理距离环境中的版权责任。结论由于版权所有问题,一些音乐治疗师“拖动他们的脚”向客户提供治疗合适的远程医疗服务。我们的研究结果表明创新的介导的疗法被避开或被遗弃。这些调查结果通过将版权法突出显示作为一种意想不到的和不受欢迎的障碍,为您在技术介导的环境中的音乐疗法实践扩散的意外和不受欢迎的障碍来提供新的贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号