首页> 外文期刊>Global health research and policy. >Health-related quality of life in Chinese workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Health-related quality of life in Chinese workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:与中国工人的健康有关的生活质量:系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Studies of health-related quality of life among workers have generated varying results. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review to synthesize the scores of health-related quality of life measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire among Chinese workers and compare the results across gender, age, occupation and region. Methods Six databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, China Science and Technology Journal Database, PubMed, Web of science and Scopus were searched for relevant publications in both English and Chinese from their inception to February 2021. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established, and study and participant characters as well as health-related quality of life scores were extracted from included publications. Study quality was assessed by using the Crombie tool. The meta-analysis including individual publications used random-effects models. Subgroups analyses by gender, age, occupation and region were also conducted to explore the source of heterogeneity. Results One hundred thirty-nine out of 1437 potential publications were included. The pooled mean scores of health-related quality of life were 14.1 for the physical domain (95%CI: 13.9–14.3), 13.7 for the psychological domain (95%CI: 13.5–13.8), 14.0 for the social relationship domain (95%CI: 13.8–14.2), 12.3 for the environment domain (95%CI: 12.1–12.5). No significant statistical difference was found between the different subgroups. Publication bias was present in the independence domain and the pooled scores were corrected to 15.0 (95%CI: 14.6–15.5) using the trim and fill method. Sensitivity analysis suggested that the results of the meta-analysis were stable. Region might be a source of heterogeneity. Workers in northeast China reported higher scores in the social relationship domain, and those in the central region reported lower scores in the environmental domain. Conclusions Chinese workers reported lower scores in four health-related quality of life domains than the general population.?Region might be a potential influencing factor for workers’ scores different, which needs?further study. The pooled scores can served as benchmarks for workplace health promotion programes in Chinese workers and global occupational health studies.
机译:背景技术与工作人员之间的健康有关的生活质量研究产生了不同的结果。本研究的目的是进行系统审查,以综合通过世界卫生组织的生活质量调查问卷衡量的健康有关的生活质量,并在性别,年龄,占领和地区进行比较结果。方法六个数据库包括中国国家知识基础设施,万芳数据,中国科技期刊数据库,中国科学和SCOPUS,从截至2021年2月的意义上搜索了英文和中国人的相关出版物。纳入和排除标准成立,除了包括的出版物中,提取了与学习和参与者人物以及与健康相关的生活质量分数提取。使用Crombie工具评估研究质量。 Meta分析,包括单个出版物使用随机效应模型。还进行了性别,年龄,职业和地区的亚组分析,以探讨异质性的来源。结果1437年潜在出版物中的一百三十九倍。与物理领域的健康相关生活质量的汇总平均分数为14.1(95%CI:13.9-14.3),13.7为心理领域(95%CI:13.5-13.8),社会关系域14.0(95 %CI:13.8-14.2),12.3为环境域名(95%CI:12.1-12.5)。在不同的亚组之间没有发现显着的统计学差异。在独立域中存在出版物偏见,汇集得分校正为15.0(95%CI:14.6-15.5),使用修剪和填充方法。敏感性分析表明,Meta分析的结果稳定。区域可能是异质性的源泉。东北地区的工人报告了社会关系领域的得分更高,中部地区的人报告了环境领域的得分降低。结论中国工人报告了四个与卫生学相关的生活域中的得分降低了,而不是一般人口.?Region可能是工人分数不同的潜在影响因素,需要进一步研究。汇集得分可以作为中国工人和全球职业健康研究的工作场所健康促进计划的基准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号