首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >A meta-analysis on the risk factors adjusted association between cardiovascular disease and COVID-19 severity
【24h】

A meta-analysis on the risk factors adjusted association between cardiovascular disease and COVID-19 severity

机译:心血管疾病与Covid-19严重程度调整关联的危险因素的荟萃分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Cardiovascular disease (CVD), one of the most common comorbidities of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has been suspected to be associated with adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients, but their correlation remains controversial. This is a quantitative meta-analysis on the basis of adjusted effect estimates. PubMed, Web of Science, MedRxiv, Scopus, Elsevier ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library and EMBASE were searched comprehensively to obtain a complete data source up to January 7, 2021. Pooled effects (hazard ratio (HR), odds ratio (OR)) and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to evaluate the risk of the adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients with CVD. Heterogeneity was assessed by Cochran’s Q-statistic, I2test, and meta-regression. In addition, we also provided the prediction interval, which was helpful for assessing whether the variation across studies was clinically significant. The robustness of the results was evaluated by sensitivity analysis. Publication bias was assessed by Begg’s test, Egger’s test, and trim-and-fill method. Our results revealed that COVID-19 patients with pre-existing CVD tended more to adverse outcomes on the basis of 203 eligible studies with 24,032,712 cases (pooled ORs = 1.41, 95% CIs: 1.32-1.51, prediction interval: 0.84-2.39; pooled HRs = 1.34, 95% CIs: 1.23-1.46, prediction interval: 0.82-2.21). Further subgroup analyses stratified by age, the proportion of males, study design, disease types, sample size, region and disease outcomes also showed that pre-existing CVD was significantly associated with adverse outcomes among COVID-19 patients. Our findings demonstrated that pre-existing CVD was an independent risk factor associated with adverse outcomes among COVID-19 patients.
机译:已怀疑冠状病毒疾病最常见的冠状病毒疾病(Covid-19)中最常见的患者的心血管疾病(Covid-19)之一已怀疑与Covid-19患者的不良结果有关,但它们的相关性仍然存在争议。这是基于调整后效应估计的定量META分析。全面搜索PubMed,Medrxiv,Scopus,Elsevier ScieCirect,Cochrane图书馆和Embase,以获得高达1月7日的完整数据源。汇总效应(危险比(HR),赔率比(或))和估计95%的置信区间(CIS)评估Covid-19患者CVD患者不良结果的风险。通过Cochran的Q统计,I2Test和Meta-返回评估异质性。此外,我们还提供了预测间隔,这有助于评估跨研究的变异是否临床显着。通过灵敏度分析评估结果的稳健性。通过BEGG的测试,EGGER的测试和修剪和填充方法评估出版物偏见。我们的研究结果表明,Covid-19预先存在的CVD患者在203例符合人数的研究的基础上往来往来不利的结果,患有24,032,712个病例(汇总或= 1.41,95%CIS:1.32-1.51,预测间隔:0.84-2.39;汇总HRS = 1.34,95%CIS:1.23-1.46,预测间隔:0.82-2.21)。通过年龄,男性比例,研究设计,疾病类型,样本量,区域和疾病结果的进一步分层分析也表明,预先存在的CVD与Covid-19患者之间的不良结果显着相关。我们的研究结果表明,预先存在的CVD是与Covid-19患者中不良结果相关的独立危险因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号