首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the Formosan Medical Association =: Taiwan yi zhi >Comparison of risk of acute kidney injury between patients receiving the combination of teicoplanin and piperacillin/tazobactam versus vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam
【24h】

Comparison of risk of acute kidney injury between patients receiving the combination of teicoplanin and piperacillin/tazobactam versus vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam

机译:临床患者急性肾损伤风险的比较,接受Teicoplanin和Piperillin / Tazobactam对Vancomycin和Piperacillin / Tazobactam的组合

获取原文
           

摘要

Background/purposeTo compare the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) among patients receiving teicoplanin (TA) plus piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) versus vancomycin (VAN) plus TZP.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records. Patients were included if a combination of glycopeptide and TZP or other selected β-lactams were used during hospitalization. In the main analysis, two study groups were identified: TA?+?TZP and VAN?+?TZP. We used 1:1 propensity score matching to control for potential confounders, and hazard ratio (HR) of AKI between study groups was calculated. We further compared the risk of AKI between patients receiving VAN?+?TZP and VAN?+?β-lactams as an auxiliary analysis to verify the validity of the study design.ResultsThe final sample contained 211 pairs of patients receiving either TA?+?TZP or VAN?+?TZP. The median dosage of TA and VAN were 10.3 and 26.7?mg/kg/day, respectively. The median trough level of VAN was 12.3?mg/L. The AKI risk in the TA?+?TZP group was similar to that in the VAN?+?TZP group (12.3% vs. 11.4%; HR?=?1.25 [0.72–2.18],p?=?0.44). The auxiliary analysis showed a higher risk of AKI in the VAN?+?TZP group than in the VAN?+?β-lactam group (13.2% vs. 9.6%; HR?=?1.63 [1.04–2.55],p?=?0.03).ConclusionOur study results showed that the risk of AKI were similar for patients receiving TA?+?TZP and VAN?+?TZP. However, low VAN and high TA dose may play a role in this finding. Further investigation on the association between AKI and TA?+?TZP is required.
机译:背景/ purposeto比较急性肾脏损伤(aki)的风险,接受Teicoplanin(ta)加上piperacillin / tazobactam / tazobactam(Tzp)与万古霉素(van)加Tzp.methodsthis是一种使用电子健康记录的回顾性队列研究。如果在住院期间使用糖肽和TZP或其他选定的β-内酰胺的组合,则包括患者。在主要分析中,确定了两组研究组:TA?+?TZP和VAN?+?TZP。我们使用了1:1倾向评分与控制潜在混淆的匹配,并计算研究组之间AKI的危险比(HR)。我们进一步比较了接受van?TZP和VAN?β-内酰胺作为辅助分析的患者之间AKI的风险,以验证研究设计的有效性。含有211对接受TA的患者的最终样品含有211对患者吗? TZP或Van?+?TZP。 TA和VAN的中值分别为10.3和26.7?Mg / kg /天。范中的面包车水平为12.3?mg / L. TA + TZP组的AKI风险与Van?+ TZP组(12.3%vs.11.4%; HR?=?1.25 [0.72-2.18],P?= 0.44)。辅助分析表现出van?+ tzp组中的aki风险较高,而不是在van?+β-内酰胺组(13.2%与9.6%; hr?= 3.63 [1.04-2.55],p?= ?0.03).Conclusionour的研究结果表明,接受TA的患者的患者的风险类似于α+ TZP和VAN?+?TZP。然而,低van和高Ta剂量可能在这一发现中发挥作用。进一步调查AKI和TA?+ TZP之间的关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号