首页> 外文期刊>The Angle orthodontist. >Effectiveness of metronidazole gel and mobile telephone short-message service reminders on gingivitis in orthodontic patients:
【24h】

Effectiveness of metronidazole gel and mobile telephone short-message service reminders on gingivitis in orthodontic patients:

机译:甲硝唑凝胶和移动电话短消息服务提醒在正畸患者中牙龈炎的有效性:

获取原文
       

摘要

Objectives To compare the effectiveness of metronidazole gel and mobile telephone short-message service (SMS) reminders on gingivitis in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. Materials and Methods The trial was double blinded (patient and investigator), and only the clinical trial unit pharmacist was unblinded. Data were collected from patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment for at least 6 months. A total of 66 patients were randomly assigned to either 0.8% metronidazole gel (n = 22), SMS reminder and placebo gel (n = 22), or placebo (control) group only (n = 22). Gingival index (GI), bleeding index (BI), and orthodontic plaque index (OPI) were evaluated on several teeth at baseline (T0) and after 4 weeks (T1). Paired-sample t-tests were used to compare mean differences of indexes at T0 and T1 in the groups, and independent-sample t-tests were used to determine the effects of interventions compared with the controls. Results Data from 64 patients were analyzed; there were 2 dropouts. There were statistically significant (P .05) reductions in GI, BI, and OPI scores from T0 to T1 for each intervention. However, there were no significant differences between each intervention and the control group. There were no adverse effects. Conclusions The null hypothesis could not be rejected. There is no difference between interventions (application of 0.8% metronidazole gel and SMS reminder for reinforcing oral hygiene) in reducing gingival inflammation in orthodontic patients.
机译:目标,用于比较甲硝唑凝胶和移动电话短信服务(SMS)提醒在经过固定的正畸治疗患者中提醒牙龈炎的有效性。试验的材料和方法是双盲(患者和调查员),并且仅取消了临床试验单位药剂师。从经历固定的正畸治疗至少6个月的患者收集数据。总共66名患者被随机分配给0.8%甲硝唑凝胶(n = 22),SMS提醒和安慰剂凝胶(N = 22),或仅安慰剂(对照)组(n = 22)。在基线(T0)的几颗牙齿上和4周(T1)的几颗牙齿上评估牙龈指数(GI),出血指数(BI)和正畸斑块指数(OPI)。配对样品T检验用于比较组中T0和T1在组中的指标的平均差异,并且使用独立的样品T检验来确定与对照相比干预的效果。分析了64名患者的结果数据;有2个辍学。对于每种干预,GI,BI和OPI的统计学意义(P <.05)减少了GI,BI和OPI分数。但是,每个干预和对照组之间没有显着差异。没有不利影响。结论零假设不能被拒绝。干预措施(0.8%甲硝唑凝胶和SMS提醒用于增强口服卫生)的缺陷之间没有差异,降低正畸患者的牙龈炎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号