...
首页> 外文期刊>Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World >Does Climate Protest Work? Partisanship, Protest, and Sentiment Pools
【24h】

Does Climate Protest Work? Partisanship, Protest, and Sentiment Pools

机译:气候抗议工作吗? 部门,抗议和情绪池

获取原文
           

摘要

This study demonstrates whether and how climate protest increases or decreases the “sentiment pools” available to the climate movement. Using an experimental vignette survey design ( n = 1,421), the author finds that compared with a control condition, peaceful marches are effective for both independents and Democrats, while civil disobedience has a positive effect among Democrats. These effects are isolated to those who are most certain of anthropogenic climate change. No effect is observed among Republicans. Despite evidence from other studies suggesting the possibility, no “backfire” effects are observed for any group or protest type. This study (1) lends supports to the use of tactical diversity within the climate movement and (2) demonstrates how the broader forces of partisanship interact with protest to shift the pool of supporters available to movements, extending our nascent collective knowledge of how partisanship shapes the outcomes of social movements and protest.
机译:本研究展示了气候抗议如何以及如何降低气候运动可用的“情绪池”。 使用实验的小插图测量设计(n = 1,421),作者认为与控制条件相比,和平游行对独立和民主人士来说都是有效的,而民事不服从民主党的积极效果。 这些效应与最肯定的人为气候变化的人分离。 共和党人之间没有效果。 尽管来自其他研究的证据表明可能性,但对于任何群体或抗议类型没有观察到“逆火”的影响。 本研究(1)借助在气候运动中使用战术多样性的支持,(2)展示了Partisanship更广泛的部队互动的互动,抗议转移适用于运动的支持者,扩大我们的新生集体知识的偏执程度 社会运动的结果和抗议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号