首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine >Primary versus early secondary referral to a specialized neurotrauma center in patients with moderate/severe traumatic brain injury: a CENTER TBI study
【24h】

Primary versus early secondary referral to a specialized neurotrauma center in patients with moderate/severe traumatic brain injury: a CENTER TBI study

机译:初级与早期二次转诊到中度/严重创伤性脑损伤患者的专业神经统治中心:中心TBI研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Prehospital care for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) varies with some emergency medical systems recommending direct transport of patients with moderate to severe TBI to hospitals with specialist neurotrauma care (SNCs). The aim of this study is to assess variation in levels of early secondary referral within European SNCs and to compare the outcomes of directly admitted and secondarily transferred patients. Patients with moderate and severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale??13) from the prospective European CENTER-TBI study were included in this study. All participating hospitals were specialist neuroscience centers. First, adjusted between-country differences were analysed using random effects logistic regression where early secondary referral was the dependent variable, and a random intercept for country was included. Second, the adjusted effect of early secondary referral on survival to hospital discharge and functional outcome [6?months Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE)] was estimated using logistic and ordinal mixed effects models, respectively. A total of 1347 moderate/severe TBI patients from 53 SNCs in 18 European countries were included. Of these 1347 patients, 195 (14.5%) were admitted after early secondary referral. Secondarily referred moderate/severe TBI patients presented more often with a CT abnormality: mass lesion (52% vs. 34%), midline shift (54% vs. 36%) and acute subdural hematoma (77% vs. 65%). After adjusting for case-mix, there was a large European variation in early secondary referral, with a median OR of 1.69 between countries. Early secondary referral was not associated with functional outcome (adjusted OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.78–1.69), nor with survival at discharge (1.05, 0.58–1.90). Across Europe, substantial practice variation exists in the proportion of secondarily referred TBI patients at SNCs that is not explained by case mix. Within SNCs early secondary referral does not seem to impact functional outcome and survival after stabilisation in a non-specialised hospital. Future research should identify which patients with TBI truly benefit from direct transportation.
机译:创伤性脑损伤的患者(TBI)的预孢子护理因其有些应急医疗系统而异,推荐直接运输中度至严重TBI的患者与专科神经统计护理(SNC)的医院。本研究的目的是评估欧洲SNC中早期二次转介水平的变化,并比较直接入院和二次转移患者的结果。在本研究中,来自前瞻性欧洲中心TBI研究的中度和严重的TBI(Glasgow Coma Scale)(Glasgow Coma Scale)患者患者。所有参与医院都是专业神经科学中心。首先,使用随机效应逻辑回归来分析调整的国家差异,其中早期次要推荐是从属变量,并且包括国家随机拦截。其次,早期二次转诊对医院排放和功能结果的调整后效果[6?one延长(GOSE)]估计使用物流和序数混合效果模型估算了Glasgow结果。包括来自18个欧洲国家的53名SNC的1347名中等/严重的TBI患者。在这1347名患者中,早期二次转诊后195名(14.5%)被录取。二次推荐中度/严重的TBI患者更常用于CT异常:质量病变(52%对34%),中线移位(54%vs.36%)和急性阴囊血肿(77%与65%)。调整案例混合后,早期次转介的欧洲欧洲变异大,国家之间的中位数或1.69。早期的二次转介与功能结果(调整或1.07,95%CI 0.78-1.69)无关,也不与放电时生存(1.05,0.58-1.90)。在欧洲,存在实质性实践变异,其二次提到的SNC患者的比例不受案例混合解释的。在SNC中,早期二级转诊似乎在非专业医院稳定后似乎不会影响功能性结果和生存。未来的研究应确定TBI真正受益于直接运输的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号