...
首页> 外文期刊>Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs >Defining “the marijuana problem”: An Analysis of the Polish daily press, 2015–2016
【24h】

Defining “the marijuana problem”: An Analysis of the Polish daily press, 2015–2016

机译:定义“大麻问题”:2015-2016的波兰每日出版社分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Aim: This study analyses discourses on marijuana in the Polish daily press and explores ways of defining “the marijuana problem” during a debate about legalisation of medical marijuana. Methods: 384 press articles published in three national newspapers in 2015–2016 were analysed. The method used was discourse analysis. The theoretical background was social constructionism, including Spector and Kitsuse’s four-stage constructionist model of defining social problems. Results: The study shows that marijuana problems were mainly constructed through criminal and politically medical discourses. In addition to celebrity and pop culture discourses, recreational marijuana use discourses and social problems discourses were identified. Discussion: The marijuana problem can be defined differently through various discourses. Definitions pertain to diverse marijuana meanings ranging from a negative marijuana-as-drug, through an ambivalent recreational marijuana up to a positively valued medical marijuana. The research pointed out that, from a discursive standpoint, the marijuana problem may be viewed as a complex network of relations between particular discourses, marijuana meanings, claim-makers and the media. Conclusion: Different definitions of the marijuana problem are constructed through a dynamic discursive and social process. Various claim-makers try to impose their meanings on marijuana. Mass media are not neutral. They also participate in defining the marijuana problem.
机译:目的:这项研究分析了大麻在波兰每日新闻中的大麻,探讨了关于医疗大麻合法化的争论期间定义“大麻问题”的方法。方法:2015 - 2016年第三届全国报纸发布的384次新闻文章分析。使用的方法是话语分析。理论背景是社会建设主义,包括旨在的旨在定义社会问题的四阶段建构主义模式。结果:该研究表明,大麻问题主要通过刑事和政治医疗致辞构建。除了名人和流行文化的话语外,娱乐大麻还使用了Discours和社会问题。讨论:大麻问题可以通过各种致命地定义不同。定义涉及多样化的大麻意义,从负面的大麻 - 药物,通过矛盾的休闲大麻,直到一个积极的医疗大麻。研究指出,从话语的角度来看,大麻问题可能被视为特定的话语,大麻含义,索赔和媒体之间的复杂关系网络。结论:大麻问题的不同定义通过动态的话语和社会过程构建。各种索赔制造商试图在大麻上施加含义。大众媒体不是中立的。他们还参与定义大麻问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号