首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >Clinical analysis of second-trimester pregnancy termination after previous caesarean delivery in 51 patients with placenta previa and placenta accreta spectrum: a retrospective study
【24h】

Clinical analysis of second-trimester pregnancy termination after previous caesarean delivery in 51 patients with placenta previa and placenta accreta spectrum: a retrospective study

机译:临床分析在51例PREVIA胎盘和胎盘ACCRETA SPICTAM 51例剖腹产后妊娠期妊娠期终止:回顾性研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Pregnancy termination during the second trimester in patients with placenta previa and placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is a complex and challenging clinical problem. Based on our literature review, there has been a relative increase in the number of such cases being treated by hysterotomy and/or local uterine lesion resection and repair. In the present study, a retrospective analysis was conducted to compare the clinical outcomes when different management strategies were used to terminate pregnancy in the patients with placenta previa and PAS. A total of 51 patients who underwent pregnancy termination in the second trimester in Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital between June 2013 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. All patients having previous caesarean delivery (CD) were diagnosed with placenta previa status and PAS. ① Among the 51 patients, 16 cases received mifepristone and misoprostol medical termination, 15 cases received mifepristone and Rivanol medical termination, but 1 of them was transferred to hysterotomy due to failed labor induction, another 20 cases were performed planned hysterotomy. There was no placenta percreta cases and uterine artery embolization (UAE) was all performed before surgery.② There were 31 cases who underwent medical termination and 30 cases were vaginal delivery. Dilation and evacuation (D&E) were used in 20 cases of medical abortion failure and in all 30 cases of difficult manual removal of placental tissue. ③ A statistically significant difference was found among the three different strategies in terms of gestational weeks, the type of placenta previa status, main operative success rate and β-HCG regression time (P??0.05). ④ There were 4(7.8%) cases who were taken up for hysterectomy because of life-threatening bleeding or severe bacteremia during or after delivery and hysterotomy. The uterus was preserved with the implanted placenta partly or completely left in situ in 47(92.2%) cases. Combined medical and/or surgical management were used for the residual placenta and the time of menstrual recovery was 52(range: 33 to 86) days after pregnancy termination. Terminating a pregnancy by vaginal delivery through medical induction of labor may be feasible if clinicians have an overall understanding of gestational age, the type of placenta previa status, the type of placenta accreta, and patients concerns about preserving fertility. A collaborative team effort in tertiary medical centers with a very experience MDT and combined application of multiple methods is required to optimize patient outcomes.
机译:孕产病患者和胎盘ACCRETA谱(PAS)妊娠期终止期间的妊娠终止是一种复杂和挑战性的临床问题。根据我们的文献综述,通过血清术和/或局部子宫病变切除和修复的这种病例的数量存在相对升高。在本研究中,进行了回顾性分析,以比较临床结果,当使用不同的管理策略终止胎盘患者的妊娠和PAS患者怀孕时。在2013年和2018年6月期间,北京妇产科第二孕中期妊娠期终止的51名患者在本研究中回顾性分析。所有具有先前剖列递送(CD)的患者被诊断为PREATA患者和PAS。 ①在51例患者中,16例接受米非司酮和米索前列醇医疗终止,15例植物正丙酮和里凡尔医疗终止,但由于劳动诱导失败,其中1例被转移到血症术,综合治疗血管切开术。没有胎盘Percreta病例和子宫动脉栓塞(阿联酋)全部进行手术前进行.②患有31例接受医学终止和30例的阴道分娩。扩张和疏散(D&E)用于20例医疗流产衰竭,并在所有30例难以移除胎盘组织中。 ③在妊娠期三种不同的策略中发现了统计学上的显着差异,胎盘类型的类型,主要手术成功率和β-HCG回归时间(p?& <0.05)。 ④由于危及生命的出血或递送和血管切开术后,有4例(7.8%)的病例被用于子宫切除术或严重的菌血症。子宫用植入的胎盘保存,部分或完全留在47(92.2%)病例中。合并的医疗和/或手术管理用于残留胎盘,月经恢复时间为52(范围:33至86)天,妊娠终止后天数。如果临床医生对孕龄的全面了解,胎盘胎盘的类型,胎盘作用的类型,胎盘作用的类型,终止妊娠,终止孕孕可能是可行的。在高等教育中心的合作团队努力具有非常经验的MDT和多种方法的联合应用需要优化患者结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号