Essentially, the United States Supreme Court plays a critical role in setting precedents that are followed by lower federal courts and state courts. This implies that faulty decision by the Supreme Court has a ripple effect, characterized by adversities in the delivery of justice across the board. Over the years, the United States Supreme Court has made various landmark rulings, some of which have been regarded as the worst decisions ever, while others have been deemed exemplary. From the 1900s and to around the mid-1900s, the United States Supreme Court made various rulings, the majority of which touched on racial segregation and discrimination of ethnic minorities. The rulings set critical precedence and gave guidelines to states with respect to the formulation and implementation of state laws. Understanding such rulings can greatly shed light regarding the historical background of the United States judicial system and what can be done to foster justice and equality in the future. This study entailed a qualitative content analysis research design to study and analyze six main cases: Pace v. Alabama (1883), Dred Scott v. Sandford (1856), Loving v. Virginia (1967), Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), Brown v. Board of Education, Topeka, Kansas (1954-55) and Ozawa v. United States (1922) . The results of the content analysis are presented. The content analysis is based on the statements and their implicit messages.
展开▼
机译：基本上，美国最高法院在制定较低联邦法院和国家法院的先例中发挥着关键作用。这意味着最高法院的错误决定具有涟漪效应，其特点是在董事会上交付正义的逆境。多年来，美国最高法院已制定了各种各样的地标裁决，其中一些人被认为是有史以来最糟糕的决定，而其他人则被视为示范。从20世纪和19世纪中期到20世纪，美国最高法院取得了各种裁决，其中大多数涉及种族隔离和少数民族的歧视。该裁决设定了严重的优先级，并为国家法律的制定和实施提供了指导意见。了解这些裁决可以很大程度上阐明了美国司法系统的历史背景，并且可以在未来培养司法和平等的情况下做些什么。本研究需要进行定性的内容分析研究设计，用于学习和分析六个主要情况：速度诉阿拉巴马州（1883），DRED SCOTT V. Sandford（1856），喜欢v。弗吉尼亚州（1967），Plessy v。Ferguson（1896）， Brown v。教育委员会，Topeka，堪萨斯州（1954-55）和ozawa v。美国（1922年）。提出了内容分析的结果。内容分析基于语句及其隐式消息。
展开▼
