首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic surgery >Comparison of the Wiltse Approach and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation Under O-arm Navigation for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures
【24h】

Comparison of the Wiltse Approach and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation Under O-arm Navigation for the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures

机译:O形臂导航下威尔顿泥土近视下的潜在椎弓根螺钉固定的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the Wiltse approach and percutaneous pedicle screw placement under O-arm navigation for the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture. Methods We enrolled a total of 54 patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar fracture who received minimally invasive treatments between October 2014 and October 2018 in this retrospective study. Among these, 28 patients (22 males and six females, with a mean age of 48.6?±?9.6?years) were treated with pedicle screw fixation through the Wiltse approach (WPSF), and another 26 (15 males and 11 females, with a mean age of 45.7?±?10.6?years) received percutaneous pedicle screw fixation under O-arm navigation (OPSF). Statistical methods were used to perform a detailed comparison of clinical outcomes, radiologic findings, and complications between the two groups obtained preoperatively, postoperatively, and at last follow-up. Results All patients underwent surgery successfully and finished a follow-up of more than 12?months. No serious complications, such as infection, blood vessel injury, or spinal cord or nerve root injury occurred. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, local Cobb angle (LCA), vertebral wedge angle (VWA), and R value were notably improved after surgery, though there was no clear discrepancy between the groups at each time point ( P ?0.05). During the follow-up period, no patients developed neurological impairment or implant-related complications, and no patients underwent revision surgery. The WPSF group had a significantly shorter operation time than the OPSF group (68.1?±?9.8 vs 76.1?±?9.0?minutes, P =?0.005). Moreover, the WPSF group showed less cost of surgery than the WPSF group (48142.1?±?1430.1 vs 59035.4?±?1152.7 CNY, P ?0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the intraoperative bleeding, length of incision, or postoperative hospitalization time ( P ?0.05). The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was 95.2% (160/168) in the WPSF group and 96.8% (151/156) in the OPSF group, with no significant difference between the groups ( P =?0.432). Conclusion Both WPSF and OPSF were safe and effective for the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture. Although the two groups showed favorable clinical and radiologic outcomes through to final follow-up, we recommended the minimally invasive WPSF given its shorter operation time and lower cost of surgery.
机译:目的这项研究的目的是评估威尔特的方法和经皮椎弓根螺钉放置下的临床结果,用于治疗胸腰椎骨折。方法我们共招收了54例神经胸腔骨折骨折,2014年10月至2018年10月在这项回顾性研究中获得了微创治疗。其中28名患者(22名男性和六名女性,平均年龄为48.6°?平均年龄为45.7?±10.6?年)在O形臂导航(OPSF)下接收经皮椎弓根螺钉固定。统计学方法用于进行临床结果的详细比较,术后,术后和最后一次随访所获得的两组之间的两组之间的并发症。结果所有患者均经过手术成功,完成了超过12个月的后续行动。没有发生严重并发症,如感染,血管损伤或脊髓或神经根损伤。手术后,视觉模拟规模(VAS)分数,OSWestry残疾指数(ODI)分数,局部Cobb角度(LCA),椎体楔角(VWA)和R值,但在每个组之间没有明显差异时间点(P&?0.05)。在随访期间,没有患者产生神经损伤或植入物相关的并发症,没有患者接受修正手术。 WPSF组的操作时间明显较短,而不是OPSF组(68.1?±9.8 Vs 76.1?±9.0?分钟,P = 0.005)。此外,WPSF组比WPSF组表现出较少的手术成本(48142.1?±1430.1 Vs 59035.4?±1152.7 cny,p& 0.001)。两组在术中出血,切口长度或术后住院时间(P> 0.05)之间没有显着差异。椎弓根螺杆放置的准确性在WPSF组中为95.2%(160/168),在OPSF组中为96.8%(151/156),组之间没有显着差异(P = 0.432)。结论WPSF和OPSF均为安全有效的胸腰椎骨折。虽然两组展示了良好的临床和放射学结果,但我们推荐了鉴于其操作时间较短和手术成本更低的微创WPSF。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号