...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Exercise Science >Different Cooling Strategies Applied During Inter-Set Rest Intervals in High-Intensity Resistance Training
【24h】

Different Cooling Strategies Applied During Inter-Set Rest Intervals in High-Intensity Resistance Training

机译:在高强度阻力训练中设定间隔间隔内应用的不同冷却策略

获取原文
           

摘要

International Journal of Exercise Science 14(2): 295-303, 2021. The purpose of this study was to verify whether cooling between sets during high-intensity resistance exercise improves physical performance and to compare performance among different sites of cooling. It is important because delaying the muscular fatigue could improve total volume at a training session which could lead to greater hypertrophy. Nine healthy and recreational resistance training experienced men, performed six tests of a biceps curl exercise on different days. The first test was the one-repetition maximum test (1RM). Following, we applied five sessions, in crossover and randomized (counter-balanced) design. The subjects received different cooling strategies in each session for 1-min (inter-set rest interval): Control (C) (no Cooling); Palm Cooling (PC); Neck Cooling (NC); Local Cooling (LC) or Tunnel Temperature Cooling (TTC). We analyzed the maximum number of repetitions and the rating of perceived exertion (RPE). The Bayesian analysis showed that no cooling strategy was able to improve performance compared to control, and just NC, when compared to control, showed a 71% probability of increasing the total volume of repetitions. Also, RPE was not modulated by any cooling strategy compared to control, but NC has a chance to reduce individuals' RPE by 52%. In conclusion, no cooling strategy was efficient to improve physical performance during a high-intensity resistance exercise.
机译:国际运动科学杂志14(2):295-303,2021。本研究的目的是验证高强度抵抗运动期间套件之间的冷却是否提高了物理性能,并比较了不同地点的冷却部位之间的性能。重要的是因为延迟肌肉疲劳可以在培训会议上改善总量,这可能导致更大的肥大。九个健康和休闲抗性训练经验丰富的男性,在不同的日子里进行了六次二头肌卷曲运动。第一个测试是一次重复最大测试(1RM)。以下情况,我们应用了五个会话,交叉和随机(反平衡)设计。受试者在每次会议中接受了不同的冷却策略,用于1分钟(嵌段间休息间隔):控制(C)(无冷却);棕榈冷却(PC);颈部冷却(NC);局部冷却(LC)或隧道温度冷却(TTC)。我们分析了最大重复次数和感知劳动(RPE)的评级。贝叶斯分析表明,与对照相比,没有冷却策略能够提高性能,并且与对照相比,NC效果显示出71%的重复总量的71%。此外,与对照相比,RPE未被任何冷却策略调节,但NC有机会将个体的RPE减少52%。总之,在高强度阻力运动期间,没有冷却策略有效改善物理性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号