...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of infectious diseases : >Performance of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test compared with real-time RT-PCR in asymptomatic individuals
【24h】

Performance of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test compared with real-time RT-PCR in asymptomatic individuals

机译:SARS-COV-2快速抗原试验的性能与无症状的实时RT-PCR相比

获取原文
           

摘要

Screening, testing and contact tracing plays a pivotal role in control of the COVID-19 pandemic. To enable this it is necessary to increase the testing capacity. This study compared a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test (RAT) and RT-PCR in 842 asymptomatic individuals from Tarapacá, Chile. A sensitivity of 69.86%, specificity of 99.61%, PPV of 94.44% and NPP of 97.22% with Ct values (Ct 27) that were significantly higher among individuals with false-negative RAT were reported. These results support the fact that RAT might have a significant impact on the identification of asymptomatic carriers in areas that lack suitable laboratories to perform SARS-CoV-2 real-time RT-PCR diagnostics, or the results take more than 24–48 h, as well as zones with high traffic of individuals such as border/customs, airports, interregional bus, train stations or in any mass testing campaign requiring rapid results.
机译:筛选,测试和联系跟踪在Covid-19流行的控制中起着枢轴作用。 要启用此,有必要提高测试能力。 该研究将SARS-COV-2快速抗原试验(大鼠)和RT-PCR与Tarapacá,智利的842个无症状胞质进行比较。 据报道,94.61%,PPV的敏感性为69.86%,特异性为94.44%,NPP为97.22%,CT值(CT> 27)在具有假阴性大鼠的个体中显着更高的CT值(CT&GT.27)。 这些结果支持大鼠对缺乏合适的实验室实时RT-PCR诊断的区域内无症状载体的鉴定产生重大影响,或者结果超过24-48小时, 以及具有高流量的区域,如边界/海关,机场,区域间巴士,火车站或任何需要快速效果的大规模测试活动。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号