...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of infectious diseases : >No significant difference between ceftriaxone and cefotaxime in the emergence of antibiotic resistance in the gut microbiota of hospitalized patients: A pilot study
【24h】

No significant difference between ceftriaxone and cefotaxime in the emergence of antibiotic resistance in the gut microbiota of hospitalized patients: A pilot study

机译:头孢曲松和头孢噻肟之间没有显着差异,在住院患者的肠道微生物肿瘤中出现抗生素抗性:试点研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Ceftriaxone and cefotaxime share a similar antibacterial spectrum and similar indications but have different pharmacokinetic characteristics. Ceftriaxone is administered once daily and 40% of its clearance is by biliary elimination, whereas cefotaxime requires three administrations per day and shows less than 10% biliary elimination. The high biliary elimination of ceftriaxone suggests a greater impact of this antibiotic on the gut microbiota than cefotaxime. The objective of this study was to compare the impact of ceftriaxone and cefotaxime on the gut microbiota. Methods A prospective clinical trial was performed that included 55 patients treated with intravenous ceftriaxone (1 g/24 h) or cefotaxime (1 g/8 h) for at least 3 days. Three fresh stool samples were collected from each patient (days 0, 3, and 7 or at the end of intravenous treatment) to assess the emergence of third-generation cephalosporin (3GC)-resistant Enterobacteriaceae , carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , toxigenic Clostridioides difficile , and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Results The emergence of 3GC-resistant gram-negative enteric bacilli ( Enterobacteriaceae ) (5.9% vs 4.7%, p 0.99), Enterococcus spp, and non-commensal microorganisms did not differ significantly between the groups. Both antibiotics reduced the counts of total gram-negative enteric bacilli and decreased the cultivable diversity of the microbiota, but the differences between the groups were not significant. Conclusion No significant difference was observed between ceftriaxone and cefotaxime in terms of the emergence of resistance.
机译:背景CeFtriaxone和Cefotaxime共享类似的抗菌谱和类似的适应症,但具有不同的药代动力学特征。 Ceftriaxone每天施用一次,40%的间隙是胆道消除,而头孢噻肟每天需要三个施用,并且显示胆道少于10%。高胆量消除头孢曲松的消除表明这种抗生素对肠道微生物群的影响更大。本研究的目的是比较头孢曲松和头孢噻肟对肠道微生物的影响。方法进行预期临床试验,其中包含55名患者用静脉内头孢菌(1g / 24小时)或头孢噻肟(1g / 8h)治疗至少3天。从每位患者(0,3和7天或静脉内处理结束时的三个新鲜凳子样品,以评估第三代头孢孢菌素(3GC) - 腐败肠杆菌,CarbapeNem耐药肠杆菌,假单胞菌铜绿假单胞菌,毒素梭氧化钛艰难梭菌和耐常霉素的肠球菌。结果3GC抗性革兰氏阴性肠溶杆菌(肠杆菌基肌)的出现(5.9%Vs 4.7%,P≫ 0.99),肠球菌SPP和非共生微生物在组之间没有显着差异。两种抗生素都减少了总革兰氏阴性肠溶杆菌的数量,并降低了微生物群的可耕种多样性,但这些组之间的差异并不显着。结论在抵抗的出现方面,Ceftriaxone和Cefotaxime之间没有观察到显着差异。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号