...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >Cigarette pack size and consumption: an adaptive randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Cigarette pack size and consumption: an adaptive randomised controlled trial

机译:香烟包装尺寸和消费:适应性随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Observational evidence suggests that cigarette pack size – the number of cigarettes in a single pack – is associated with consumption but experimental evidence of a causal relationship is lacking. The tobacco industry is introducing increasingly large packs, in the absence of maximum cigarette pack size regulation. In Australia, the minimum pack size is 20 but packs of up to 50 cigarettes are available. We aimed to estimate the impact on smoking of reducing cigarette pack sizes from ≥25 to 20 cigarettes per pack. A two-stage adaptive parallel group RCT in which Australian smokers who usually purchase packs containing ≥25 cigarettes were randomised to use only packs containing either 20 (intervention) or their usual packs (control) for four weeks. The primary outcome, the average number of cigarettes smoked per day, was measured through collecting all finished cigarette packs, labelled with the number of cigarettes participants smoked. An interim sample size re-estimation was used to evaluate the possibility of detecting a meaningful difference in the primary outcome. The interim analysis, conducted when 124 participants had been randomised, suggested 1122 additional participants needed to be randomised for sufficient power to detect a meaningful effect. This exceeded pre-specified criteria for feasible recruitment, and data collection was terminated accordingly. Analysis of complete data (n?=?79) indicated that the mean cigarettes smoked per day was 15.9 (SD?=?8.5) in the intervention arm and 16.8 (SD?=?6.7) among controls (difference???0.9: 95%CI?=???4.3, 2.6). It remains unclear whether reducing cigarette pack sizes from ≥25 to 20 cigarettes reduces cigarette consumption. Importantly, the results of this study provide no evidence that capping cigarette pack sizes would be ineffective at reducing smoking. The limitations identified in this study can inform a more efficient RCT, which is urgently required to address the dearth of experimental evidence on the impact of large cigarette pack sizes on smoking.
机译:观察证据表明香烟包装尺寸 - 单包装中的香烟数量与消费相关,但缺乏因果关系的实验证据。在没有最大卷烟包装尺寸调节的情况下,烟草业正在引入越来越大的包装。在澳大利亚,最低包装尺寸为20,但最多50支香烟的包装。我们的目标是估计每包≥25到20支香烟的减少卷烟包装尺寸的影响。一个两级自适应平行组RCT,其中通常购买含有≥25支香烟的澳大利亚吸烟者被随机使用,仅使用包含20个(干预)或其通常包装(控制)的包装四周。主要结果,通过收集所有成品卷烟包来测量每天吸烟的平均卷烟数量,标有卷烟的卷烟参与者的数量。临时样本大小重新估计用于评估检测主要结果的有意义差异的可能性。在124名参与者随机化时进行的临时分析,建议1122所需的其他参与者需要随机化以获得足够的力量来检测有意义的效果。这超过了可行招聘的预先指定标准,并相应地终止了数据收集。完整数据分析(N?=?79)表明,干预臂中烟熏的平均卷烟为15.9(SD?= ... 8.5),在控制中,16.8(SD?= 6.7)(差异为0.9: 95%ci?= ??? 4.3,2.6)。仍然尚不清楚减少≥25到20支香烟的卷烟包尺寸是否降低了卷烟消耗。重要的是,本研究的结果不提供封装卷烟包装尺寸在减少吸烟时无效的证据。本研究中确定的局限性可以向一个更有效的RCT通知,这是迫切需要解决关于大型卷烟包尺寸对吸烟的影响的实验证据的缺乏。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号