首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >Exploring the impact of a decision support algorithm to improve clinicians’ chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy assessment and management practices: a two-phase, longitudinal study
【24h】

Exploring the impact of a decision support algorithm to improve clinicians’ chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy assessment and management practices: a two-phase, longitudinal study

机译:探讨决策支持算法的影响改善临床医生化疗诱导的周围神经病变评估和管理实践:两阶段,纵向研究

获取原文
       

摘要

BACKGROUND:Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) negatively affects physical function and chemotherapy dosing, yet, clinicians infrequently document CIPN assessment and/or adhere to evidence-based CIPN management in practice. The primary aims of this two-phase, pre-posttest study were to explore the impact of a CIPN clinician decision support algorithm on clinicians' frequency of CIPN assessment documentation and adherence to evidence-based management.METHODS:One hundred sixty-two patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy (e.g., taxanes, platinums, or bortezomib) answered patient-reported outcome measures on CIPN severity and interference prior to three clinic visits at breast, gastrointestinal, or multiple myeloma outpatient clinics (n?=?81 usual care phase [UCP], n?=?81 algorithm phase [AP]). During the AP, study staff delivered a copy of the CIPN assessment and management algorithm to clinicians (N?=?53) prior to each clinic visit. Changes in clinicians' CIPN assessment documentation (i.e., index of numbness, tingling, and/or CIPN pain documentation) and adherence to evidence-based management at the third clinic visit were compared between the?AP and UCP using Pearson's chi-squared test.RESULTS:Clinicians' frequency of adherence to evidence-based CIPN management was higher in the AP (29/52 [56%]) than the UCP (20/46 [43%]), but the change was not statistically significant (p?=?0.31). There were no improvements in clinicians' CIPN assessment frequency during the AP (assessment index?=?0.5440) in comparison to during the UCP (assessment index?=?0.6468).CONCLUSIONS:Implementation of a clinician-decision support algorithm did not significantly improve clinicians' CIPN assessment documentation or adherence to evidence-based management. Further research is needed to develop theory-based implementation interventions to bolster the frequency of CIPN assessment and use of evidence-based management strategies in practice.TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.Gov, NCT03514680 . Registered 21 April 2018.
机译:背景:化疗诱导的周围神经病变(CIPN)对物理功能和化疗给药产生负面影响,临床医生在实践中不经常地记录CIPN评估和/或遵守基于证据的CIPN管理。这种两阶段的主要目的是探讨了CIPN临床医生决策支持算法对CIPN评估文件临床医生频率的影响,并遵守基于证据的管理。方法:一百六十二次接受患者神经毒性化疗(例如,紫杉烷,铂或硼替佐米)回答了患者报告的患者报告的结果措施对乳腺癌,胃肠道或多发性骨髓瘤外门诊诊所的三个临床诊所之前的CIPN严重程度和干扰(n?= 81常规护理阶段[UCP] ,n?=?81算法阶段[ap])。在AP期间,研究人员在每次诊所访问之前将CIPN评估和管理算法的CIPN评估和管理算法副本提供给临床医生(N?=?53)。在使用Pearson的Chi Squared测试的情况下,比较了临床医生CIPN评估文件的变化(即麻木,刺痛和/或CIPN疼痛文件的依据,并在第三个诊所访问中遵守基于证据的管理。结果:AP(29/52 [56%])的临床医生遵守基于证据的CIPN管理的频率比UCP(20/46 [43%]),但变化没有统计学意义(P? =?0.31)。在AP期间,临床医生的CIPN评估频率没有改善(评估指数?= 0.5440)与UCP(评估指数?= 0.6468).Conclusions:临床医生决策支持算法的实施没有显着改善临床医生的CIPN评估文件或遵守基于证据的管理。需要进一步的研究来开发基于理论的实施干预措施,以加强CIPN评估的频率和在实践中使用基于证据的管理策略。注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT03514680。注册2018年4月21日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号