首页> 外文期刊>Dermatology and Therapy >Translating the Investigator’s Static Global Assessment to the Eczema Area and Severity Index in Studies of Crisaborole for Atopic Dermatitis
【24h】

Translating the Investigator’s Static Global Assessment to the Eczema Area and Severity Index in Studies of Crisaborole for Atopic Dermatitis

机译:将调查员对湿疹地区的静态全球评估转化为特应性皮炎的菊花池研究中的湿疹地区和严重性指数

获取原文
           

摘要

IntroductionAtopic dermatitis (AD) severity was measured in two phase?3 US studies of crisaborole ointment, 2%, in patients aged?≥?2?years using the Investigator’s Static Global Assessment (ISGA), an FDA-recommended scale. Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is a validated scale used globally to assess AD severity in clinical trials. The objective of this study is to aid interpretability of ISGA by translating ISGA scores to EASI scores.MethodsISGA was mapped to EASI using published EASI severity strata by Chopra et?al. and Leshem et?al. and pooled data from phase?3 trials CrisADe CORE 1 and CORE 2, which evaluated crisaborole in patients aged?≥?2?years with mild-to-moderate AD (crisaborole, n =?1016; vehicle, n =?506). Least squares mean (LSM) percentage change from baseline (?B) in EASI and proportion of patients with 50%, 75%, and 90% improvement (EASI-50, EASI-75, and EASI-90, respectively) on day 29 were computed for mapped EASI. The relationship between changes in ISGA and changes in EASI was assessed using data from three abrocitinib trials.ResultsISGA was mapped to EASI using 70,000 random simulations. LSM (standard error) for ?B in mapped EASI at day 29 (crisaborole versus vehicle) was??26.3% (17) versus 45.2% (35) ( P =?0.0671) using Chopra strata and??43.1% (4.6) versus??5.2% (8.4) ( P ?0.0001) using Leshem strata. EASI-50, EASI-75, and EASI-90 rates were 72.1% versus 57.6%, 63.0% versus 47.8%, and 55.0% versus 40.1%, respectively, using Chopra strata ( P ?0.0001 for each difference). These rates were 68.8% versus 54.0%, 54.8% versus 40.5%, and 38.9% versus 27.2%, respectively ( P ?0.0001 for each difference) using Leshem strata. Mean two-point improvement in ISGA was comparable to EASI-90.ConclusionMapped EASI results were consistent with ISGA results in crisaborole phase?3 trials. Simulation methodologies yielded consistent results and may aid in interpretability of ISGA across clinical studies.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02118766, NCT02118792.
机译:介绍性皮炎(AD)严重程度在两相?3美国研究令人震惊的摩克索药膏,2%的患者中衡量?≥?2?2?使用调查员的静态全球评估(ISGA),FDA推荐规模。湿疹地区和严重程度指数(EASI)是全球使用的验证规模,以评估临床试验中的广告严重程度。本研究的目的是通过将ISGA分数翻译为EASI得分来帮助ISGA的可解释性。方法使用Chopra等,使用已发表的Easi严重程度映射到Easi。和leeshem等。来自阶段的汇总数据?3试验Crosade Core 1和Core 2,其评估患者患者的脆孔(患者≥2Ω·2年,用轻度至中度广告(Millaborole,N = 1016;车辆,n =?506)。最小二乘意味着(LSM)EASI中基线(βb)的百分比变化和50%,75%和90%的患者的比例在第29天(分别为90%,75%,EASI-50和EASI-90)被计算为映射Easi。使用来自三个Abrocitinib试验的数据进行评估ISGA变化与EASI的变化之间的关系.Resultsisga使用70,000个随机仿真映射到EASI。 LSM(标准误差)在第29天(Trussaborole Versus载体)的映射Easi中的B ?? 26.3%(17)与45.2%(35)(P = 0.0671)使用ChopraStraat拉和?? 43.1%(4.6)使用leeshem strata与Δθ5.2%(8.4)(p <0.0001)。 EASI-50,EASI-75和EASI-90率为72.1%,而使用CHOPRA STRATA(P <0.0001的P <0.0001)分别为47.6%,与47.8%的55.8%,55.0%分别为40.1%。这些速率与54.0%的速率为68.8%,54.8%与40.5%,38.9%,分别使用leeshem strata的27.2%(每个差异为0.0001)。 ISGA的平均两点改善与EASI-90相当。结论映射EASI结果与ISGA导致的ISGA导致TRUEABORE相3试验一致。仿真方法产生了一致的结果,并可有助于临床研究中ISGA的解释性.TirdrangedClinicTrials.gov标识符:NCT02118766,NCT02118792。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号