首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary research >Evaluation using latent class models of the diagnostic performances of three ELISA tests commercialized for the serological diagnosis of Coxiella burnetii infection in domestic ruminants
【24h】

Evaluation using latent class models of the diagnostic performances of three ELISA tests commercialized for the serological diagnosis of Coxiella burnetii infection in domestic ruminants

机译:使用三种ELISA测试诊断性能的潜在类模型进行评估,以为国内反刍动物血清菌感染的血清诊断血清诊断

获取原文
           

摘要

ELISA methods are the diagnostic tools recommended for the serological diagnosis of Coxiella burnetii infection in ruminants but their respective diagnostic performances are difficult to assess because of the absence of a gold standard. This study focused on three commercial ELISA tests with the following objectives (1) assess their sensitivity and specificity in sheep, goats and cattle, (2) assess the between- and within-herd seroprevalence distribution in these species, accounting for diagnostic errors, and (3) estimate optimal sample sizes considering sensitivity and specificity at herd level. We comparatively tested 1413 cattle, 1474 goat and 1432 sheep serum samples collected in France. We analyzed the cross-classified test results with a hierarchical zero-inflated beta-binomial latent class model considering each herd as a population and conditional dependence as a fixed effect. Potential biases and coverage probabilities of the model were assessed by simulation. Conditional dependence for truly seropositive animals was high in all species for two of the three ELISA methods. Specificity estimates were high, ranging from 94.8% [92.1; 97.8] to 99.2% [98.5; 99.7], whereas sensitivity estimates were generally low, ranging from 39.3 [30.7; 47.0] to 90.5% [83.3; 93.8]. Between- and within-herd seroprevalence estimates varied greatly among geographic areas and herds. Overall, goats showed higher within-herd seroprevalence levels than sheep and cattle. The optimal sample size maximizing both herd sensitivity and herd specificity varied from 3 to at least 20 animals depending on the test and ruminant species. This study provides better interpretation of three widely used commercial ELISA tests and will make it possible to optimize their implementation in future studies. The methodology developed may likewise be applied to other human or animal diseases.
机译:ELISA方法是推荐用于反刍动物Coxiella Burnetii感染的血清学诊断的诊断工具,但由于没有金标准,它们各自的诊断性能难以评估。本研究重点关注三个商业ELISA测试,以下目的(1)评估其绵羊,山羊和牛的敏感性和特异性,(2)评估这些物种中患有植物中的血液升迁分布,核算疑难和诊断误差(3)考虑畜群水平的敏感性和特异性,估计最佳样本尺寸。我们在法国收集的1413次牛,1474只牛和1432只羊血清样本进行了比较。我们将交叉分类的测试结果分析了与分层零充气的β-二项级潜在阶级模型,考虑每个群体作为人口和条件依赖性作为固定效果。通过模拟评估模型的潜在偏差和覆盖概率。对于三种ELISA方法中的两种,所有物种的条件依赖性都很高。特异性估算高,范围为94.8%[92.1; 97.8]至99.2%[98.5; 99.7],敏感性估计通常低,范围从39.3 [30.7; 47.0]至90.5%[83.3; 93.8]。在地理区域和畜群中,群中的内普拉斯普罗旺斯估计估计变化很大。总体而言,山羊在绵羊和牛内显示出高于牛群血管升压水平。根据试验和反刍动物物种,最佳样本尺寸最大化群体敏感度和群体特异性的血液敏感度和群体特异性的血迹特异性的变化也会变化至至少20只动物。本研究提供了更好地解释了三种广泛使用的商业ELISA测试,并将使其在未来的研究中优化其实施。该方法同样适用于其他人或动物疾病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号