...
首页> 外文期刊>The oncologist >Novel Risk Scoring System for Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
【24h】

Novel Risk Scoring System for Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

机译:用免疫检查点抑制剂治疗转移性肾细胞癌患者的新风险评分系统

获取原文

摘要

Background The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria are the gold standard for risk-stratifying patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC). We developed a novel risk scoring system for patients with mRCC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 100 ICI-treated patients with mRCC at Winship Cancer Institute from 2015 to 2018. Several baseline variables were collected, including markers of inflammation, body mass index (BMI), and sites of metastatic disease, and all were considered for inclusion in our risk scoring system. Upon variable selection in multivariable model, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), BMI, and number and sites of metastases at baseline were used for risk score calculation. Patients were categorized using four-level risk groups as good (risk score = 0), intermediate (risk score = 1), poor (risk score = 2), or very poor (risk score = 3–4). Cox's proportional hazard model and the Kaplan-Meier method were implemented for survival outcomes. Results Most patients were male (66%) with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (72%). The majority (71%) received anti–programmed cell death protein-1 monotherapy. Our risk scoring criteria had higher Uno's concordance statistics than IMDC in predicting overall survival (OS; 0.71 vs. 0.57) and progression-free survival (0.61 vs. 0.58). Setting good risk (MLR 0.93, BMI ≥24, and D_Met = 0) as the reference, the OS hazard ratios were 29.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.64–238.9), 6.58 (95% CI, 0.84–51.68), and 3.75 (95% CI, 0.49–28.57) for very poor, poor, and intermediate risk groups, respectively. Conclusion Risk scoring using MLR, BMI, and number and sites of metastases may be an effective way to predict survival in patients with mRCC receiving ICI. These results should be validated in a larger, prospective study. Implications for Practice A risk scoring system was created for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The results of this study have significant implications for practicing oncologists in the community and academic setting. Importantly, these results identify readily available risk factors that can be used clinically to risk-stratify patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who are treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
机译:背景技术国际转移性肾细胞癌数据库联盟(IMDC)标准是具有转移性肾细胞癌(MRCC)的风险分层患者的金标准。我们为用免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIS)治疗的MRCC患者开发了一种新的风险评分系统。方法从2015年至2018年开始,我们对Winship癌症研究所的100名ICI治疗患者进行了回顾性分析。收集了几种基线变量,包括炎症的标志物,体重指数(BMI)和转移性疾病的部位,所有考虑纳入我们的风险评分系统。在多变量模型中的可变选择后,基线中单核细胞对淋巴细胞比(MLR),BMI和转移的数量和位点用于风险评分计算。患者用四级风险群体分类为好(风险得分= 0),中间(风险得分= 1),差(风险得分= 2),或者非常差(风险得分= 3-4)。 COX的比例危险模型和Kaplan-Meier方法用于生存结果。结果大多数患者是雄性(66%),细胞肾细胞癌(72%)。大多数(71%)接受了反向细胞死亡蛋白-1单一疗法。我们的风险评分标准具有更高的UNO的一致性统计数据,而不是预测整体存活(OS; 0.71 vs.0.57)和无进展生存率(0.61 vs.0.58)。设定良好的风险(MLR <0.93,BMI≥24和D_MET = 0)作为参考,OS危险比率为29.5(95%置信区间[CI],3.64-238.9),6.58(95%CI,0.84- 51.68)和3.75(95%CI,0.49-28.57)分别用于非常差,差和中间风险群体。结论使用MLR,BMI和转移数和网站的风险评分可能是预测MRCC接受ICI患者存活的有效方法。这些结果应在更大的前瞻性研究中验证。对实践的影响是针对用免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的转移性肾细胞癌的患者创建了风险评分系统。该研究的结果对练习社区和学术环境中的肿瘤学家具有重大影响。重要的是,这些结果识别可获得的危险因素,可临床上使用免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的转移性肾细胞癌的风险分层。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号