首页> 外文期刊>Risk Management and Healthcare Policy >Risk Management Assessments and Recommendations Among Students, Staffs, and Health Care Workers in Educational Biomedical Laboratories
【24h】

Risk Management Assessments and Recommendations Among Students, Staffs, and Health Care Workers in Educational Biomedical Laboratories

机译:教育生物医学实验室的学生,员工和医疗工作人员之间的风险管理评估和建议

获取原文
           

摘要

Background:Safety in laboratories is one of the most crucial topics for all educational institutes. All-hazards need to be identified, evaluated, and controlled whenever possible, following the risk management (RM) process. This study evaluates two academic laboratories' risks and safety in the Department of Biomedical Science (BMS) at Qatar University (QU). The goal is to eliminate or reduce any risks to the students, teaching assistants, laboratory technicians, faculties, and other related workers, following an RM process.Methods:A cross-sectional study was performed from January to March 2020 in the BMS at QU. The study sample comprised of microbiology and hematology laboratories. Checklists and data collection sheets were used for data collection. Hazard evaluation failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) was used. The risk priority number (RPN) was calculated for all the identified hazards. For hazard control, the hierarchy of controls was followed.Results:The number of identified hazards was thirteen (n=13) in the hematology laboratory and sixteen (n=16) in the microbiology laboratory. Chemical and ergonomic hazards had the highest percentages in both laboratories, with 25% in the microbiology laboratory and 31% in the hematology laboratory. Both laboratories were free from radiation hazards. There is a significant difference between adopted and recommended control measures in each laboratory in terms of likelihood, severity, and risk priority number (RPN).Conclusion:Both chemical and ergonomic hazards account for almost a quarter of the hazards in both laboratories. The recommended control measure can decrease the severity and likelihood of identified hazards.? 2021 AlShammari et al.
机译:背景:实验室的安全是所有教育机构最重要的主题之一。在风险管理(RM)过程之后,需要识别,评估和控制所有危害。本研究评估了卡塔尔大学生物医学科学(BMS)部的两项学术实验室风险和安全性。目标是在RM过程中消除或减少学生,教学助理,实验室技术人员,院系和其他相关工人的任何风险。 。研究样品由微生物学和血液学实验室组成。清单和数据收集表用于数据收集。使用危害评估失败模式和效果分析(FMEA)。为所有已识别的危害计算风险优先级(RPN)。对于危险控制,遵循对照的层次。结果:血液学实验室中已识别的危害的数量是十三(n = 13),在微生物学实验室中的十六(n = 16)。化学和符合人体工程学的危害在两个实验室中的百分比最高,微生物学实验室中有25%,血液学实验室中有31%。两个实验室都没有辐射危害。在可能性,严重程度和风险优先级(RPN)中,每个实验室采用和推荐控制措施之间采用和推荐控制措施之间存在显着差异推荐的控制措施可以降低识别危险的严重程度和可能性。 2021 alshammari等。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号