首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive therapies in the treatment of high-risk IgA nephropathy
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive therapies in the treatment of high-risk IgA nephropathy

机译:免疫抑制疗法治疗高危IgA肾病治疗的疗效和安全性

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND:IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is one of the significant contributing factors of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). It is reported that over half of patients with IgAN accompany multiple high-risk factors, which increase the risk of ESRD progression. Studies have shown that immunosuppressive agents were beneficial in high-risk IgAN, but the efficacy and safety have not been fully demonstrated yet. The present study aims to elucidate the efficacy of commonly used immunosuppressants in high-risk IgAN and their relative safety profiles via a network meta-analysis strategy.METHODS:Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) eligible for this network meta-analysis were included to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different immunosuppressants for high-risk IgAN. Main outcomes and measures include incidence of renal composite end point, the rate of total remission, adverse events, and proteinuria. Besides, subgroup analysis and cluster analysis were carried out.RESULTS:This network meta-analysis of 37 RCTs involving 3012 participants found that Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) combined with corticosteroids (CS) was superior to other interventions in end point events and proteinuria. Cyclosporine A (CsA) plus CS was the best option for clinical remission rate, and supportive care (SC) was the safest treatment. Cluster analysis showed that MMF CS and Leflunomide (LEF) CS were best protocols in efficacy and safety. Subgroup analysis indicated the best benefits of MMF were presented among the Asian population, and the benefits increased with the increase of follow-up duration. The effect of Cyclophosphamide (CTX) CS on crescent IgAN was better than that of other risk factors. Moreover, the increasing follow-up duration was negatively associated with the effect.CONCLUSIONS:MMF CS and LEF CS appear to serve as the best choice for treating high-risk IgAN than other immunosuppressive therapies.Copyright ? 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
机译:背景:IgA肾病(Igan)是末期肾病(ESRD)的重要因素之一。据报道,超过一半的IGAN患者伴随着多种高风险因素,这增加了ESRD进展的风险。研究表明,免疫抑制剂在高风险IGAN中有益,但尚未完全证明疗效和安全性。本研究旨在通过网络元分析策略来阐明常用免疫抑制剂及其相对安全谱中的常用免疫抑制剂的功效。方法:包括符合此网络的随机对照试验(RCT)进行评估,以评估不同免疫抑制剂对高风险IGAN的功效和安全性。主要结果和措施包括肾复合终点的发病率,总缓解率,不良事件和蛋白尿。此外,进行亚组分析和聚类分析。结果:该网络META分析37个RCT涉及3012名参与者,发现霉酚酸酯(MMF)与皮质类固醇(CS)相结合,优于终点事件和蛋白尿的其他干预措施。环孢菌素A(CSA)加上CS是临床缓解率的最佳选择,并且支持性护理(SC)是最安全的处理。聚类分析表明,MMF CS和leflunomide(LEF)CS是有效性和安全性的最佳方案。亚组分析表明,亚洲人口中,MMF的最佳益处,随着随访期限的增加,益处增加。环磷酰胺(CTX)Cs对新月IgAn的影响优于其他危险因素。此外,随后的后续持续时间与效果负相关。结论:MMF CS和LEF CS似乎是治疗高风险IGAN的最佳选择,而不是其他免疫抑制治疗。 2021提交人。由Wolters Kluwer Health,Inc。出版

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号