首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >The effect of anesthesia on the magnitude of the postoperative systemic inflammatory response in patients undergoing elective surgery for colorectal cancer in the context of an enhanced recovery pathway
【24h】

The effect of anesthesia on the magnitude of the postoperative systemic inflammatory response in patients undergoing elective surgery for colorectal cancer in the context of an enhanced recovery pathway

机译:增强恢复途径背景下患有直肠癌患者术后术后全身炎症反应术后全身炎症反应幅度的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

ABSTRACT:There are reports that the use of regional anesthesia (RA) may be associated with better perioperative surgical stress response in cancer patients compared with general anesthetics (GA). However, the role of anesthesia on the magnitude of the postoperative systemic inflammatory response (SIR) in colorectal cancer patients, within an enhanced recovery pathway (ERP), is not clear.The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of anesthesia, within an enhanced recovery pathway, on the magnitude of the postoperative SIR in patients undergoing elective surgery for colorectal cancer.Database of 507 patients who underwent elective open or laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery between 2015 and 2019 at a single center was studied. The anesthetic technique used was categorized into either GA or GA RA using a prospective proforma. The relationship between each anesthetic technique and perioperative clinicopathological characteristics was examined using binary logistic regression analysis.The majority of patients were male (54%), younger than 65 years (41%), either normal or overweight (64%), and were nonsmokers (47%). Also, the majority of patients underwent open surgery (60%) and received mainly general regional anesthetic technique (80%). On univariate analysis, GA RA was associated with a lower day 4 CRP (≤150/150?mg/L) concentration. On day 4, postoperative CRP was associated with anesthetic technique [odds ratio (OR) 0.58; confidence interval (CI) 0.31-1.07; P?=?.086], age (OR 0.70; CI 0.50-0.98; P?=?.043), sex (OR 1.15; CI 0.95-2.52; P?=?.074), smoking (OR 1.57; CI 1.13-2.19; P?=?.006), preoperative mGPS (OR 1.55; CI 1.15-2.10; P?=?.004), and preoperative dexamethasone (OR 0.70; CI 0.47-1.03; P?=?.072). On multivariate analysis, day 4 postoperative CRP was independently associated with anesthetic technique (OR 0.56; CI 0.32-0.97; P?=?.039), age (OR 0.74; CI 0.55-0.99; P?=?.045), smoking (OR 1.58; CI 1.18-2.12; P?=?.002), preoperative mGPS (OR 1.41; CI 1.08-1.84; P?=?.012), and preoperative dexamethasone (OR 0.68; CI 0.50-0.92; P?=?.014).There was a modest but an independent association between RA and a lower magnitude of the postoperative SIR. Future work is warranted with multicenter RCT to precisely clarify the relationship between anesthesia and the magnitude of the postoperative SIR.Copyright ? 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
机译:摘要:与全面麻醉剂(GA)相比,有报道称,与癌症患者(GA)相比,使用区域麻醉(RA)的使用可能与癌症患者的更好的外科手术应力反应相关联。然而,麻醉对结肠直肠癌患者的术后全身炎症反应(SIR)的作用,在增强的恢复途径(ERP)中,目前尚不清楚。本研究的目的是检查麻醉,在增强的恢复途径内,在接受直肠癌接受选择性手术的患者术后先生的大小。研究了2015年和2019年在单一中心之间接受选修开放或腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的507名患者。使用的麻醉技术被分类为GA或GA RA使用潜在的形式。使用二元物流回归分析检查每种麻醉技术与围手术期临床病理学特征之间的关系。大多数患者是男性(54%),小于65岁(41%),正常或超重(64%),是非助手(47%)。此外,大多数患者接受了开放的手术(60%),主要是通用区域麻醉技术(80%)。在单变量分析上,GA RA与较低的第4天CRP(≤150/& 150×mg / L)浓度相关。在第4天,术后CRP与麻醉技术相关[赔率比(或)0.58;置信区间(CI)0.31-1.07; p?= 086],年龄(或0.70; ci 0.50-0.98; p?= 043),性别(或1.15; ci 0.95-2.52; p?= 074),吸烟(或1.57; ci; ci 1.13-2.19; p?= 006),术前mgps(或1.55; ci 1.15-2.10; p?=Δ004),术前地塞米松(或0.70; ci 0.47-1.03; p?= 072) 。在多变量分析上,第4天术后CRP与麻醉技术(或0.56; CI 0.32-0.97; P?=β.039),年龄(或0.74; CI 0.55-0.99; P?=〜045),吸烟(或1.58; ci 1.18-2.12; p?=Δ= 002),术前mgps(或1.41; ci 1.08-1.84; p?= 012)和术前地塞米松(或0.68; ci 0.50-0.92; p? =?014)。在术后先生的RA和较低的严重程度之间是一种温和而是一个独立的关联。未来的工作是有关多中心RCT的保证,精确澄清麻醉和术后Sir.copytight之间的关系? 2021提交人。由Wolters Kluwer Health,Inc。出版

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号