首页> 外文期刊>Medicine. >Clinical significance of prognostic nutritional index in renal cell carcinomas
【24h】

Clinical significance of prognostic nutritional index in renal cell carcinomas

机译:肾细胞癌预后营养指数的临床意义

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

ABSTRACT:Prognostic nutritional index (PNI) could reflect the nutrition and inflammation status in cancer patients. This study aims to identify the prognostic significance of PNI in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC).A total of 694 RCC patients from our institution were included in this study. The prognostic correlation between PNI and overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was analyzed respectively using Kaplan-Meier method and univariate and multivariate Cox model. Studies about the association between pretreatment or preoperative PNI and prognosis of RCC were systemically reviewed and a meta-analysis method was performed to further evaluate the pooled prognostic value of PNI in RCC.267 (38.47%) RCC patients had low PNI according to the cut off value (49.08). Low PNI was associated with poor OS (P??.001) and RFS (P??.001), respectively. In the multivariate Cox analysis, PNI was identified to be an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR]?=?2.13, 95%CI: 1.25-3.62, P?=?.005). Compared to other nutritional indexes, this risk correlation of PNI is better than that of geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI; HR?=?1.19; P?=?.531), while is no better than that of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR; 1/HR?=?2.56; P??.001) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR; 1/HR?=?2.85; P??.001) respectively. Meanwhile, additional 4785 patients from 6 studies were included into pooled analysis. For RCC patients who underwent surgery, low preoperative PNI was significantly associated with worse OS (pooled HR?=?1.57, 95%CI: 1.37-1.80, P??.001) and worse RFS (pooled HR?=?1.69, 95%CI: 1.45-1.96, P??.001). Furthermore, low PNI (41-51) was also significantly associated with poor OS (HR?=?1.78, 95%CI: 1.26-2.53 P??.05) and poor RFS (HR?=?2.03, 95%CI: 1.40-2.95, P??.05) in advanced cases treated with targeted therapies.The present evidences show that PNI is an independent prognostic factor in RCC. Low PNI is significant associated with poor prognosis of RCC patients.Copyright ? 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
机译:摘要:预后营养指数(PNI)可以反映癌症患者的营养和炎症状态。本研究旨在鉴定PNI对肾细胞癌(RCC)患者的预后意义.A,我们的机构共有694名RCC患者纳入本研究。分别使用Kaplan-Meier方法和单变量和多变量Cox模型分析PNI和整体存活(OS)和无复发存活(RFS)之间的预后相关性。关于预处理或术前PNI之间的关联和RCC预后的研究得到全身综述,进行了荟萃分析方法,进一步评价rCC.267中PNI的合并预后价值(38.47%)RCC患者根据切割的低PNI OFF值(49.08)。低PNI分别与差的OS(P≤001)和RFS(P≤001)相关。在多变量COX分析中,鉴定PNI是OS的独立预后因子(危险比[HR] =Δ2.13,95%CI:1.25-3.62,P?= 005)。与其他营养指标相比,PNI的这种风险相关性优于老年营养风险指数(GNRI; HR?=?1.19; P?=〜531),虽然没有比中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比率(NLR ; 1 / hr?=Δ=?2.56; p?α.& 001)和血小板淋巴细胞比(PLR; 1 / hr?=Δ2.85; 001)。同时,汇总分析中含有来自6项研究的另外4785名患者。对于接受手术的RCC患者,低术前PNI与更严重的OS显着相关(汇总的HR?=?1.57,95%CI:1.37-1.80,P?& 001)和更差的RFS(汇集HR?= 1.69 ,95%CI:1.45-1.96,p?& 001)。此外,低PNI(& 41-51)也与差的OS(HR?= 1.78,95%CI:1.26-2.53)和差的RFS(HR?=?2.03 95%CI:1.40-2.95,p?& 05)在靶向疗法治疗的先进病例中。目前的证据表明,PNI是RCC的独立预后因素。低PNI与RCC患者的预后差异有显着相关。 2021提交人。由Wolters Kluwer Health,Inc。出版

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号