首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Public Health >Protecting the Public's Health in Pandemics: Reflections on Policy Deliberation and the Role of Civil Society in Democracy
【24h】

Protecting the Public's Health in Pandemics: Reflections on Policy Deliberation and the Role of Civil Society in Democracy

机译:保护公众的健康:关于政策审议的思考以及民间社会在民主中的作用

获取原文
       

摘要

The COVID-19 pandemic (“the pandemic”) has magnified the critical importance of public policy deliberation in public health emergency circumstances when normal health care operations are disrupted, and crisis conditions prevail. Adopting the lens of syndemic theory, the disproportionate impact of the pandemic on vulnerable older adults suggests that the pandemic has heightened pre-existing precarities and racial inequities across diverse older adult populations, underlining the urgency of needed policy reforms. While the pandemic has called attention to systemic failures in U.S. public health emergency planning at both federal and state levels of government, the important role of civil society in influencing policy decision making and advocating for legal and ethics reforms and social change in a democracy calls for more open dialogue in aging, public health and legal communities and constituencies. To foster this dialogue, one public health lawyer, who is also a bioethicist and gerontological social work researcher and served as chair of the New York State Bar Association Health Law Section COVID Task Force in 2020 (“Task Force”), shares her first-person perspectives on the process of leading the development of a statewide bar's recommendations for policy reforms, including the challenges and conflicts encountered. A hospital-based attorney and clinical bioethicist brings a clinical ethics perspective to the discussions. This first-person contribution discusses the power of constituencies to influence policy deliberation in a democracy, and the implications of the Task Force recommendations for future aging and public health policy, particularly in view of the high suffering burdens and trauma older persons and older people of color have borne during the pandemic.
机译:Covid-19大流行(“大流行”)在正常医疗保健行动中断时,公共卫生应急情况下的公共政策审议的批判性重要性。采用思考思考理论,大流行对易受攻击的老年人的不成比例的影响表明,大流行提高了各种老年成年人群的预先存在的前一种,种族不公平,强调了所需政策改革的紧迫性。虽然大流行引起了联邦和州政府的公共卫生应急计划的全身失败,但民间社会在影响政策决策和倡导民主的法律和道德改革和社会变革中的重要作用老龄化,公共卫生和法律社区和选区更加开放对话。为了培养这一对话,一个公共卫生律师,也是一名生物肠道和老年主义社会工作研究员,并担任纽约州律师协会卫生法律科技卫生部Covid工作队的主席(“工作队”),她首先股票 - 关于领导国家全国政策改革建议的发展过程的观点,包括遇到的挑战和冲突。基于医院的律师和临床生物肠道,为讨论提供了一种临床伦理的观点。这一第一员贡献讨论了组织在民主中影响政策审议的权力,以及工作队建议对未来老龄化和公共卫生政策的影响,特别是鉴于高痛苦的负担和创伤老年人和老年人颜色在大流行期间承担了。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号