首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Public Health >Analysis of Hierarchical Routine Data With Covariate Missingness: Effects of Audit & Feedback on Clinicians' Prescribed Pediatric Pneumonia Care in Kenyan Hospitals
【24h】

Analysis of Hierarchical Routine Data With Covariate Missingness: Effects of Audit & Feedback on Clinicians' Prescribed Pediatric Pneumonia Care in Kenyan Hospitals

机译:协变失踪分层常规数据分析:审计和反馈对临床医生规定的小儿肺炎护理的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Routine clinical data are widely used in many countries to monitor quality of care. A limitation of routine data is missing information which occurs due to lack of documentation of care processes by health care providers, poor record keeping, or limited health care technology at facility level. Our objective was to address missing covariates while properly accounting for hierarchical structure in routine pediatric pneumonia care. Methods: We analyzed routine data collected during a cluster randomized trial to investigating the effect of audit and feedback (A&F) over time on inpatient pneumonia care among children admitted in 12 Kenyan hospitals between March and November 2016. Six hospitals in the intervention arm received enhance A&F on classification and treatment of pneumonia cases in addition to a standard A&F report on general inpatient pediatric care. The remaining six in control arm received standard A&F alone. We derived and analyzed a composite outcome known as Pediatric Admission Quality of Care (PAQC) score. In our analysis, we adjusted for patients, clinician and hospital level factors. Missing data occurred in patient and clinician level variables. We did multiple imputation of missing covariates within the joint model imputation framework. We fitted proportion odds random effects model and generalized estimating equation (GEE) models to the data before and after multilevel multiple imputation. Results: Overall, 2,299 children aged 2 to 59 months were admitted with childhood pneumonia in 12 hospitals during the trial period. 2,127 (92%) of the children (level 1) were admitted by 378 clinicians across the 12 hospitals. Enhanced A&F led to improved inpatient pediatric pneumonia care over time compared to standard A&F. Female clinicians and hospitals with low admission workload were associated with higher uptake of the new pneumonia guidelines during the trial period. In both random effects and marginal model, parameter estimates were biased and inefficient under complete case analysis. Conclusions: Enhanced A&F improved the uptake of WHO recommended pediatric pneumonia guidelines over time compared to standard audit and feedback. When imputing missing data, it is important to account for the hierarchical structure to ensure compatibility with analysis models of interest to alleviate bias.
机译:背景:常规临床数据广泛应用于许多国家来监测护理质量。日常数据的限制是缺少的信息,由于医疗保健提供者,较差的记录保存或设施水平的医疗保健技术缺乏护理程序或有限的医疗技术。我们的目标是解决缺少的协变量,同时正确地核对常规小儿肺炎护理中的等级结构。方法:我们分析了在一组随机试验期间收集的常规数据,以调查审计和反馈(A&F)随着时间的推移,在2016年3月和11月12月在2016年3月和11月12日在12月12日之间提供的儿童接受的儿童患儿。干预ARM在六名医院接受了增强A&F在肺炎患者的分类和治疗外,除了一般住院性小儿科小儿科的标准A&F报告。剩下的六个控制臂单独接受标准A&F.我们得出并分析了称为小儿入院护理质量(PAQC)评分的复合结果。在我们的分析中,我们调整了患者,临床医生和医院水平因素。患者和临床医生级别变量发生缺失数据。我们在联合模型贷款框架内做了多次缺失的协变者。我们拟合了多级多级估算前后数据的比例随机效果模型和广义估计方程(GEE)模型。结果:总体上,2,299名2至59个月的儿童在试用期间在12家医院患有儿童肺炎。 378名临床医生跨越12家医院,2127名(92%)的儿童(1)款被录取。与标准A&F相比,增强A&F导致随着时间的推移改善住院性儿科肺炎治疗。在试用期间,录取工作量低的女性临床医生和医院的临近工作量低与新的肺炎准则的摄取有关。在随机效应和边际模型中,在完全案例分析下,参数估计均偏向和效率低下。结论:增强A&F改善了谁推荐的儿科肺炎随着时间的推荐准则,与标准审计和反馈相比。当丢失缺失数据时,要考虑分层结构,以确保与分析模型兼容以减轻偏见的分析模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号