首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Medicine >Accuracy Improvement of IOL Power Prediction for Highly Myopic Eyes With an XGBoost Machine Learning-Based Calculator
【24h】

Accuracy Improvement of IOL Power Prediction for Highly Myopic Eyes With an XGBoost Machine Learning-Based Calculator

机译:IOL 功率预测 精度 改进 高度近视眼 随着 XGBoost 机器学习 为基础的 计算器

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: To develop a machine learning-based calculator to improve the accuracy of IOL power predictions for highly myopic eyes. Methods: Data of 1,450 highly myopic eyes from 1,450 patients who had cataract surgeries at our hospital were used as internal dataset (train and validate). Another 114 highly myopic eyes from other hospitals were used as external test dataset. A new calculator was developed using XGBoost regression model based on features including demographics, biometrics, IOL powers, A constants, and the predicted refractions by Barrett Universal II (BUII) formula. The accuracies were compared between our calculator and BUII formula, and axial length (AL) subgroup analysis (26.0–28.0, 28.0–30.0, or ≥30.0 mm) was further conducted. Results: The median absolute errors (MedAEs) and median squared errors (MedSEs) were lower with the XGBoost calculator (internal: 0.25 D and 0.06 D 2 ; external: 0.29 D and 0.09 D 2 ) vs. the BUII formula (all P ≤ 0.001). The mean absolute errors and were 0.33 ± 0.28 vs. 0.45 ± 0.31 (internal), and 0.35 ± 0.24 vs. 0.43 ± 0.29 D (external). The mean squared errors were 0.19 ± 0.32 vs. 0.30 ± 0.36 (internal), and 0.18 ± 0.21 vs. 0.27 ± 0.29 D 2 (external). The percentages of eyes within ±0.25 D of the prediction errors were significantly greater with the XGBoost calculator (internal: 49.66 vs. 29.66%; external: 78.28 vs. 60.34%; both P 0.05). The same trend was in MedAEs and MedSEs in all subgroups (internal) and in AL ≥30.0 mm subgroup (external) (all P 0.001). Conclusions: The new XGBoost calculator showed promising accuracy for highly or extremely myopic eyes.
机译:目的:开发一种基于机器学习的计算器,提高IOL功率预测对高近视眼的准确性。方法:从我们医院患者的1,450名患者提供1,450名高度近视眼的数据被用作内部数据集(火车和验证)。另外114名来自其他医院的高度近视眼被用作外部测试数据集。使用基于包括人口统计学,生物测量,IOL功率,常数和预测折射的特征,使用XGBoost回归模型开发了一种新的计算器,由Barret Universal II(Buii)公式。在我们的计算器和BuII公式之间比较了轴向长度(Al)亚组分析(26.0-28.0,28.0-30.0或≥30.0mm)。结果:XGBoost计算器(内部:0.25d和0.06 d 2;外部:0.29 d和0.09 d 2)与XGBoost计算器中位绝对误差(Medaes)和中位数(Medses)较低0.001)。平均绝对误差和0.33±0.28与0.45±0.31(内部),0.35±0.24与0.43±0.29d(外部)。平均平均误差为0.19±0.32与0.30±0.36(内部),0.18±0.21与0.27±0.29 d 2(外部)。 XGBoost计算器(内部:49.66与29.66%;外部:78.28与60.34%)显着更大,预测误差内的±0.25d的百分比明显更大.P& 0.05)。在所有亚组(内部)和Al≥30.0mm子组(外部)(所有P <0.001)中,相同的趋势是在蛋白酶和MEDSES中。结论:新的XGBoost计算器对高度或极其近视的眼睛表现出有希望的准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号