首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Medicine >Accuracy Improvement of IOL Power Prediction for Highly Myopic Eyes With an XGBoost Machine Learning-Based Calculator
【24h】

Accuracy Improvement of IOL Power Prediction for Highly Myopic Eyes With an XGBoost Machine Learning-Based Calculator

机译:基于XGBoost机器学习的计算器的高度近视眼力度的IOL功率预测的准确性改进

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: To develop a machine learning-based calculator to improve the accuracy of IOL power predictions for highly myopic eyes. Methods: Data of 1450 highly myopic eyes from 1450 patients who had cataract surgeries at our hospital were used as internal dataset (train and validate). Another 114 highly myopic eyes from other hospitals were used as external test dataset. A new calculator was developed using XGBoost regression model based on features including demographics, biometrics, IOL powers, A constants, and the predicted refractions by Barrett Universal II (BUII) formula. The accuracies were compared between our calculator and BUII formula, and axial length (AL) subgroup analysis (26.0–28.0, 28.0–30.0, or ≥30.0mm) was further conducted. Results: The median absolute errors (MedAEs) and median squared errors (MedSEs) were lower with the XGBoost calculator (internal: 0.25 D and 0.06 D2; external: 0.29 D and 0.09 D2) versus the BUII formula (all P ≤0.001). The mean absolute errors and were 0.33±0.28 versus 0.45±0.31 (internal), and 0.35±0.24 versus 0.43±0.29 D (external). The mean squared errors were 0.19±0.32 versus 0.30±0.36 (internal), and 0.18±0.21 versus 0.27±0.29 D2 (external). The percentages of eyes within ±0.25 D of the prediction errors were significantly greater with the XGBoost calculator (internal: 49.66% versus 29.66%; external: 78.28% versus 60.34%; both P &0.05). The same trend was in MedAEs and MedSEs in all subgroups (internal) and in AL ≥30.0mm subgroup (external) (all P &0.001). Conclusions: The new XGBoost calculator showed promising accuracy for highly or extremely myopic eyes.
机译:目的:开发基于机器学习的计算器,提高IOL功率预测对高近视眼的准确性。方法:从我们医院的白内障手术中有1450名患者的1450名高度近视眼的数据被用作内部数据集(火车和验证)。另外114名来自其他医院的高度近视眼被用作外部测试数据集。基于包括人口统计学,生物识别性,IOL功率,常数和预测折射的特征,使用XGBoost回归模型开发了一种新的计算器,Barret Universal II(Buii)公式。在我们的计算器和BuII公式之间比较了精度,进一步进行了轴向长度(Al)亚组分析(26.0-28.0,28.0-30.0或≥30.0mm)。结果:XGBoost计算器(内部:0.25d和0.06d2),中位绝对误差(Medaes)和中位数(Medses)和中位数(Medses)较低;外部:0.29 d和0.09d2)与Buii公式(所有p≤0.001)。平均绝对误差和0.33±0.28与0.45±0.31(内部),0.35±0.24对0.43±0.29d(外部)。平均平均误差为0.19±0.32,而0.30±0.36(内部),0.18±0.21对0.27±0.29d2(外部)。 XGBoost计算器(内部:49.66%与29.66%的预测误差内的±0.25d内的眼睛百分比显着更大;外部:78.28%与60.34%; P <0.05)。在所有亚组(内部)和Al≥30.0mm子组(外部)中(外部)(所有P <0.001)中,相同的趋势是在蛋黄酱和Medses中。结论:新的XGBoost计算器对高度或极其近视的眼睛表现出有希望的准确性。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号