...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Medicine >Evaluation of an Automatic Classification Algorithm Using Convolutional Neural Networks in Oncological Positron Emission Tomography
【24h】

Evaluation of an Automatic Classification Algorithm Using Convolutional Neural Networks in Oncological Positron Emission Tomography

机译:在肿瘤正电子网络中使用卷积神经网络自动分类算法的评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Our aim was to evaluate the performance in clinical research and in clinical routine of a research prototype, called positron emission tomography (PET) Assisted Reporting System (PARS) (Siemens Healthineers) and based on a convolutional neural network (CNN), which is designed to detect suspected cancer sites in fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 F-FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT). Method: We retrospectively studied two cohorts of patients. The first cohort consisted of research-based patients who underwent PET scans as part of the initial workup for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The second cohort consisted of patients who underwent PET scans as part of the evaluation of miscellaneous cancers in clinical routine. In both cohorts, we assessed the correlation between manually and automatically segmented total metabolic tumor volumes (TMTVs), and the overlap between both segmentations (Dice score). For the research cohort, we also compared the prognostic value for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of manually and automatically obtained TMTVs. Results: For the first cohort (research cohort), data from 119 patients were retrospectively analyzed. The median Dice score between automatic and manual segmentations was 0.65. The intraclass correlation coefficient between automatically and manually obtained TMTVs was 0.68. Both TMTV results were predictive of PFS (hazard ratio: 2.1 and 3.3 for automatically based and manually based TMTVs, respectively) and OS (hazard ratio: 2.4 and 3.1 for automatically based and manually based TMTVs, respectively). For the second cohort (routine cohort), data from 430 patients were retrospectively analyzed. The median Dice score between automatic and manual segmentations was 0.48. The intraclass correlation coefficient between automatically and manually obtained TMTVs was 0.61. Conclusion: The TMTVs determined for the research cohort remain predictive of total and PFS for DLBCL. However, the segmentations and TMTVs determined automatically by the algorithm need to be verified and, sometimes, corrected to be similar to the manual segmentation.
机译:简介:我们的目标是评估临床研究中的性能以及研究原型的临床常规,称为正电子发射断层扫描(PET)协助报告系统(Siemens Healthineers),并基于卷积神经网络(CNN),旨在检测氟-18氟脱氧葡萄糖(18 F-FDG)PET /计算机断层扫描(CT)中的可疑癌症位点。方法:我们回顾性研究了两位患者的队列。第一个队列由基于研究的患者组成,该患者接受了PET扫描作为弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的初始次数的一部分。第二个队列由接受宠物扫描的患者组成,作为临床常规评估杂项癌症的一部分。在两个群组中,我们评估手动和自动分段的总代谢肿瘤卷(TMTV)之间的相关性,以及两个分段(骰子得分)之间的重叠。对于研究队列,我们​​还将手动和自动获得了TMTV的无进展生存期(PFS)和整体存活(OS)的预后价值。结果:对于第一个队列(研究队列),回顾性分析了119名患者的数据。自动和手动分段之间的中位数分数为0.65。自动和手动获得的TMTV之间的内部相关系数为0.68。 TMTV结果都是PFS(危险比:2.1和3.3分别用于自动基于和手动的TMTV)和OS(危险比:2.4和3.1分别用于自动基于和手动基于TMTV)的PFS(危险比:2.1和3.3)。对于第二个队列(常规队列),回顾性分析了430名患者的数据。自动和手动分段之间的中位数分数为0.48。自动和手动获得的TMTV之间的腹积相关系数为0.61。结论:研究队列确定的TMTV仍然是DLBCL的总和PFS的预测。但是,需要验证算法自动确定的分段和TMTV,有时会校正以类似于手动分段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号