...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials >Contemporary analysis of ETEST for antibiotic susceptibility and minimum inhibitory concentration agreement against Pseudomonas aeruginosa from patients with cystic fibrosis
【24h】

Contemporary analysis of ETEST for antibiotic susceptibility and minimum inhibitory concentration agreement against Pseudomonas aeruginosa from patients with cystic fibrosis

机译:患有囊性纤维化患者的抗生素敏感性和最小抑制型铜绿假单胞菌的抗生素敏感性和最小抑制浓度协同的当代分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Cystic fibrosis (CF) acute pulmonary exacerbations are often caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, including multi-drug resistant strains. Optimal antibiotic therapy is required to return lung function and should be guided by in vitro susceptibility results. There are sparse data describing ETEST performance for CF isolates using contemporary isolates, methods and interpretation, as well as novel antibiotics, such as ceftazidime–avibactam and ceftolozane–tazobactam. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n?=?105) isolated during pulmonary exacerbation from patients with CF were acquired from 3 US hospitals. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were assessed by reference broth microdilution (BMD) and ETEST for aztreonam, cefepime, ceftazidime, ceftazidime–avibactam, ceftolozane–tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, meropenem, piperacillin–tazobactam, and tobramycin. Broth microdilution was conducted in concordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M100. ETEST methodology reflected package insert recommendations. Performance of ETEST strips was evaluated using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Susceptibility Testing Manufacturers Association (STMA) guidance. Of the 105 P. aeruginosa included, 46% had a mucoid phenotype. ETEST MICs typically read 0–1 dilution higher than BMD for all drugs. Categorical agreement and essential agreement ranged from 64 to 93% and 63 to 86%, respectively. The majority of observed errors were minor. A single very major error occurred with ceftazidime (4.2%). For ceftazidime–vibactam, 2 very major errors were observed and both were within essential agreement. Major errors occurred for aztreonam (3.3%), cefepime (9.4%), ceftazidime–avibactam (5.3%, adjusted 2.1%), ceftolozane–tazobactam (1%), meropenem (3.3%), piperacillin–tazobactam (2.9%), and tobramycin (1.5%). ETEST methods performed conservatively for most antibiotics against this challenging collection of P. aeruginosa from patients with CF.
机译:囊性纤维化(CF)急性肺部加剧通常由假单胞菌铜绿假单胞菌引起,包括多毒性株。最佳的抗生素治疗需要返回肺功能,并应通过体外易感结果引导。使用当代分离物,方法和解释以及新的抗生素等CFED抗生素,例如Ceftazidime-Avibactam和Ceftolozane-Tazobactam,存在稀疏数据。在CF患者的肺癌期间分离出铜绿假单胞菌(N?= 105),从3患者中获取3美国医院。最小抑制浓度(MIC)通过参考肉汤微量稀释(BMD)和Etest for Aztreonam,Cefepime,Ceftazidime,Ceftazane-Tazobactam,Ceftolozane-Tazobactam,Ciprofloxacin,左氧氟沙霉素,氟哌林,哌嗪 - 塔唑酰胺和染发蛋白。用临床和实验室标准研究所M100一致地进行肉汤微量脱硫。 ETEST方法反映了包插入建议。使用食品和药物管理局(FDA)和易感性检测制造商协会(STMA)指导评估优化条带的性能。在包含的105吨铜绿假单胞院中,46%有粘液表型。 ETEST MIC通常读取比所有药物高于BMD的0-1稀释。分类协议和基本协议分别为64%至93%和63%至86%。大多数观察到的错误都是未成年人。头孢他啶(4.2%)发生单一非常重大错误。对于Ceftazidime-vibactam,观察到2个非常重大的错误,两者都在必要的协议之内。 Aztreonam(3.3%),头孢噻肟(9.4%),Ceftazide-Avibactam,Ceftolozane-Tazobactam(1%),梅洛西林 - 塔拉酰胺(2.9%),和霉霉素(1.5%)。优柔的方法保守用于对大多数抗生素免受CF患者的危害铜绿假单胞菌的挑战性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号